General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: White Knight [View all]lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Last edited Wed Feb 19, 2014, 02:08 PM - Edit history (3)
For a group of people who don't have a problem seeing the sexism in a held-open door, I'm surprised that you don't reject the pedestal that the... let's call 'em "white knights" since you're familiar with the terminology... are putting "their women" upon.
No, actually, I'm not surprised. The pedestal looks like high ground and feels like a position of moral superiority, and one can pretend that you got there all by yourself.
At least a door is easier to hold for someone with greater upper body strength. Online, there's no advantage at all.
And yes, there is an innate male protector instinct (I'd walk through fire!!! I'd walk through it both ways!! For realz!), and you're keenly aware of and working it.
This is all aggravated by the unfortunate continued public denial of the legal and social elevation of women and the denigration of men in our culture. Everyone is aware of this problem, but most people including men, and especially White Knights, are busy rationalizing, denying and pretending its not there. White knights are traditionalists, and heroes, and within western culture, they are a toxin. These are men who practice chivalry. White knights are males who defend women, but not because women are people which might be noble. Rather, they defend women only because they are women. This almost always encompasses a willful blindness to the behavior and utterance of the women so defended.
Thanks for posting this. I read it, and it didn't make me sick. So I reposted it and it still didn't make me sick. I conclude it must be a bug of some sort going around Boston.
If feminism is even passingly interested in equality, then white knights are not feminist allies.
And since these guys are not even officially welcome in the club, it's more than a little tragic and sad.
They'd walk through fire, but just don't suggest that it's the fire of imaginary dragons.