Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

2naSalit

(102,144 posts)

3. Well

Reply to Drew Richards (Original post)

Sun Feb 23, 2014, 11:34 PM

Feb 2014

there's whole lot of there there.

The DOJ should confront this as it will likely violate nearly all EEOC rules. Remember, EEOC means Equal Employment Opportunity Commission so it based on employment issues.

But it does mean that discrimination against "target" groups regarding employment will surely be violated in general. then there is a whole sector of federal contractors who are subject to rules that are generally more focused. In fact some landmark SCOTUS decisions are based on federal contractors in AZ.

Here's some info to browse... so that I don't misinterpret anything.

http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/compliance.cfm

http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/subject.cfm

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I have a question for those that know the GS laws of EEOC...If Arizona enacts this law doesn't that [View all] Drew Richards Feb 2014 OP

It's a jobs creation bill. This clearly unconstitutional bill creates jobs for Republican lawers OffWithTheirHeads Feb 2014 #1

Brilliant! Who says tea party is stupid. Thx for explaining. Drew Richards Feb 2014 #2

Well 2naSalit Feb 2014 #3

A little OT but I kinda wish Brewer would sign it truebluegreen Feb 2014 #4

Exactly how do you tell if someone is gay - cheyanne Feb 2014 #5