Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Holy Fuck Me Harder! [View all]Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)54. Yes that thread is speculation
Did I say it wasn't?
I see you replied to me there, but self-deleted.
You really enjoy following me around DU, huh?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
314 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Me too, Lost_Count, BTW, a belated but hearty welcome to DU. Right glad tameetcha!
Ecumenist
Feb 2014
#202
The talking point being distributed right now is "this isn't really illegal".
Democracyinkind
Feb 2014
#5
Yes, those talking points have become more than familiar with each illegal violation
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#12
No its not....that would be YOU accusing people of being paid shills.....
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#101
apparently you do....You weren't in this conversation to add anything except to stalk
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#119
because I didn't call Romney Gov? Thats your big "Get"? Congratulating yourself for that?
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#127
I am not sure what the hell you have been talking abou from the start your ONLY
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#130
Yes, exactly. Anyone who joins in those attacks in my experience for over eight years now, has
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#187
Good points re transparency. In the early Bush years on some Dem forums, maybe others, it was
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#300
The what and the how is what journalists are SUPPOSED to tell us. I wish the MSM would do it
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#250
The "why", without the particulars of "who" is covered pretty well by L. Fletcher Prouty's book...
rwsanders
Feb 2014
#45
Thanks "hoot" ...this is another piece of info from original article deserving separate
KoKo
Feb 2014
#6
... what you say conjures this image...I hate feeling like I'm living in the belly of the beast...
ancianita
Feb 2014
#75
American intelligence has been under the control of Wall Street since William Donovan at the OSS.
Scuba
Feb 2014
#9
So why was it not stopped before now? This is illegal and if it has been going on for
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#14
They had a starring role in a book I mentioned above by L. Fletcher Prouty on the JFK assassination.
rwsanders
Feb 2014
#46
If this were to have come out under President Bush, I'm sure the reaction from
neverforget
Feb 2014
#27
Exactly. It it was wrong under a Republican then it's wrong under a Democrat.
neverforget
Feb 2014
#73
Not as silly as your post earlier today defending medicare payments to private insurers.
Cali_Democrat
Feb 2014
#30
You think this OP is baseless and worth mocking, but THIS evidence-free speculation:
Hissyspit
Feb 2014
#52
Pointing out the obvious fact that you follow me around DU is character assassination?
Cali_Democrat
Feb 2014
#78
Oh I see...I'm forcing you to stalk me because I post things you disagree with
Cali_Democrat
Feb 2014
#84
Once again I see you have nothing to add. Just here to attack posts. Why dont you stay in the BOG.
rhett o rick
Feb 2014
#88
Ah yes, the BOG signature ridicule emoticon. Does Sid give you extra points each time
rhett o rick
Feb 2014
#94
If someone is paying either of you, they arent getting much for their money.
rhett o rick
Feb 2014
#100
No links needed. I will take you at your word. It's possible that I misjudged you. If so, shame onme
rhett o rick
Feb 2014
#110
Why are you even dignifiying that person's comment? No one here owes him/her anything
Number23
Feb 2014
#147
"You really enjoy following me around DU, huh?" I know someone who does that...
cherokeeprogressive
Feb 2014
#139
You're goddamn right I was pissed off at Ambassador Stevens' murder. Looks like I was the only one.
cherokeeprogressive
Feb 2014
#184
I refuse to read this because he's a trayter and he lives in a forein country.
progressoid
Feb 2014
#13
Whoever orchestrates these campaign, and we have seen one of them exposed thoroughly
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#176
I think it's just desperation. And as I said, they are not very imaginative people.
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#191
I found it extremely informative, and missed the entertainment value. Could you
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#105
THIS is what they are trying to hide. The REAL reason for the 'surveillance'
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#118
If you haven't already, you really need to read "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man"
justiceischeap
Feb 2014
#24
Cass Sunstein thinks it's a wonderfully effective method of message control.
OnyxCollie
Feb 2014
#159
All markets are free, some markets are freer than others. Forget about it, Jake, its Chinatown,
marble falls
Feb 2014
#66
Related: How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive, and Destroy Reputations
Purveyor
Feb 2014
#79
Fucking A. I strongly believe in government's ability to be a positive force in people's lives.
TheKentuckian
Feb 2014
#194
" I strongly believe in government's ability to be a positive force in people's lives."
woo me with science
Feb 2014
#243
How did this become rocket science? It didn't. I'm starting to wonder if all the screeching about
TheKentuckian
Feb 2014
#296
if you consider what might happen if anti-surveillance, pro-privacy and freedom voters coalesced
reddread
Feb 2014
#297
Seems they like the corporate dominance, fuck the environment, fuck the people aspects just fine.
TheKentuckian
Feb 2014
#298
Congratulations, fellow leftists. we are validated, and vindicated, in so many ways.
Zorra
Feb 2014
#135
Yep. Paranoia about infiltrators almost always does more damage than a potential infiltrator.
stevenleser
Feb 2014
#219
Another revelation from today: FBI claims Sonny Liston took a fall in his fight with Cassius Clay,
secondwind
Feb 2014
#229
No matter. It's always good for people to know that paid RW corporatists swarm the internet in order
Zorra
Feb 2014
#246
You've got to wonder why some posters object to this discussion, old news as it is...
Romulox
Feb 2014
#252
Exactly. It's a perfectly valid, and increasingly important, discussion on a progressive website. nt
Zorra
Feb 2014
#254
The idea that somethings is less true now--because it was true before--is bizarre on its face.
Romulox
Feb 2014
#255
There is no confirmation here, only yet another accusation. ALmost a nice try. nt
stevenleser
Feb 2014
#264
Some of the "Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation" have been used in this thread...
friendly_iconoclast
Feb 2014
#304
the irony is that the regulation and atmosphere needed to fix this shit is still
certainot
Feb 2014
#257
i remember reading about a connection between talk radio, ABC, and cia's william? casey and his
certainot
Feb 2014
#292
I know a retired Episcopal priest who was an SEC prosecutor before becoming a priest . . .
markpkessinger
Feb 2014
#285