Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Fair Warning: I WILL challenge this kind of bigotry. [View all]pipi_k
(21,020 posts)46. I think doing that
is possibly getting into the realm of diagnosis, which people who aren't mental health professionals should not do.
"Mentally ill" works, IMO, and here's why I think so...
Because people who do terrible things are NOT mentally healthy.
I guess the other choice might be to call them "evil", but then again...how can someone tell who is "evil" and who is not?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
52 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And, if I may add, please do not pontificate to us about how pills are pushed by Big Pharma -
hedgehog
Feb 2014
#6
But we aren't just everyday folk...we are people who other people discriminate against
HereSince1628
Feb 2014
#16
What you describe is an intellectually lazy shorthand way to criticize, and I have been guilty of it
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2014
#17
I think that what we call "passive aggressive" response is predicated on two things:
TygrBright
Feb 2014
#39
Thank you for your very well reasoned comment. But in defense of a lot of commenters at DU,
totodeinhere
Feb 2014
#40
Maybe rather than trying to find the right label, we should put our effort...
TygrBright
Feb 2014
#51