General Discussion

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)

57. Actually, it is a real headline. I was going to post the Alan Colmes article...

Sat Mar 22, 2014, 03:36 PM

Mar 2014

... so I put Liberaland's headline as the subject line...

.... then in the mean time I had read the other article and ended up putting the other article in the text box.

I simply forgot to change the subject line.

I added the link to the subject line's article up in the OP.

I hope that answers your question sufficiently.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

65 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

GOP Bill Would Force Divorcing Women To Get Permission Before Sex [View all] Tx4obama Mar 2014 OP

We have something like 4 Republicans left in our state government MannyGoldstein Mar 2014 #1

That's what they specialize in. Arcanetrance Mar 2014 #2

Honestly, it looks to me like they're saying all this crazy shit mindwalker_i Mar 2014 #4

Bingo! Scuba Mar 2014 #18

First no smoking with children in the car or house yeoman6987 Mar 2014 #26

Where's Newt when you need his saggy ass? mindwalker_i Mar 2014 #3

This is nothing short of MEDIEVAL. CaliforniaPeggy Mar 2014 #5

Let's hope women will find nothing better to do in 2014 than vote them out of office! What a world! freshwest Mar 2014 #17

That's ridiculous. Separation Mar 2014 #6

Its wonky but not crazy eyed wonky Token Republican Mar 2014 #7

It's just really fucking creepy to butt into people's lives to this extent. nomorenomore08 Mar 2014 #12

A divorce petition is asking a court to butt into pipoman Mar 2014 #37

Yes, misleading reporting. ManiacJoe Mar 2014 #13

See post #4. Scuba Mar 2014 #19

There was just that case in NYC about the woman who lost custody because she had sex. cui bono Mar 2014 #8

The woman who also Lunacee_2013 Mar 2014 #49

Yeah, and iirc the judge granted custody and reimbursement of the child care cui bono Mar 2014 #55

This message was self-deleted by its author Th1onein Mar 2014 #9

+100 CFLDem Mar 2014 #10

Someone is grinding an ax in the legislature over a tough divorce. marble falls Mar 2014 #11

what the holy hell is their problem? uppityperson Mar 2014 #14

Republicans: keeping women servile and in chains since they arose as a party. Warpy Mar 2014 #15

This has nothing to do with women specifically pipoman Mar 2014 #38

actually it does left is right Mar 2014 #40

Cause vs. effect.... Thor_MN Mar 2014 #42

File that under.. Cha Mar 2014 #16

Why did you change the headline of the article in your OP to frame it as gender specific? MadrasT Mar 2014 #20

+1 n/t n2doc Mar 2014 #22

good question Duckhunter935 Mar 2014 #52

See Comment #57 Tx4obama Mar 2014 #58

Actually, it is a real headline. I was going to post the Alan Colmes article... Tx4obama Mar 2014 #57

So what happens when "getting some strange" quaker bill Mar 2014 #21

What really galls me is that Whisp Mar 2014 #23

Or people like the OP are stirring shit pipoman Mar 2014 #39

Take it up with Alan Colmes at Liberaland, it is his headline - I've added the link to the OP Tx4obama Mar 2014 #59

Can you imagine the checklist they woud need to fill out? Nanjing to Seoul Mar 2014 #24

Really? This is what they waste time on? chrisa Mar 2014 #25

And the OP changing the headline leads pipoman Mar 2014 #32

While it's obviously a bad bill, the headline is also deeply misleading. N.t. Donald Ian Rankin Mar 2014 #27

I can't believe this shenmue Mar 2014 #28

No, that was the OP changing the story to something it isn't. . pipoman Mar 2014 #31

I thought this was polihood Mar 2014 #29

Probably the number one complaint pipoman Mar 2014 #30

Less government in your lives. Unless you might be having sex. tanyev Mar 2014 #33

This current war on women sure has intensity and persistence. ananda Mar 2014 #34

Except this has nothing to do with gender. .. pipoman Mar 2014 #36

1. it's not gender-specific. 2. it is specific to "in the home." 3.it's where custody is involved magical thyme Mar 2014 #35

That's exactly what it's about! pipi_k Mar 2014 #41

They could add this to Sweet Freedom Mar 2014 #46

I'm stunned to see someone defending this here. Shoulders of Giants Mar 2014 #54

So, I'm pretty sure pipi_k Mar 2014 #60

It's a bad idea because it will make divorces more messy and painful more often than less. Donald Ian Rankin Mar 2014 #62

I'm not defending it. The title is extremely misleading. magical thyme Mar 2014 #63

That should be grounds for expulsion from the state house Takket Mar 2014 #43

Would that penalty also be for Republicans having sex? MrMickeysMom Mar 2014 #44

Lock 'em up. PowerToThePeople Mar 2014 #45

This is just creepy. Lunacee_2013 Mar 2014 #47

Did you read it? pipoman Mar 2014 #50

Yup, and I still find it creepy. Nt. Lunacee_2013 Mar 2014 #61

snip*unless the express permission is granted by the courts. WTF? The courts are going to love Jefferson23 Mar 2014 #48

I would bet more time is wasted pipoman Mar 2014 #51

When will they get the F Faux pas Mar 2014 #53

Will the issuance of Chastity Belts be controlled by the state or contracted out? Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2014 #56

Republicans claim to not like big government unless it's in people's bluestate10 Mar 2014 #64

I hope everyone read the update at the end of the article: Raksha Mar 2014 #65