General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Does the Big Bang breakthrough offer proof of God? [View all]NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)That's why it fell out of favor in the mid-20th century.
You cite a study about CMB before it was actually discovered (your source is 1954, first paper on CMB was published ten years later).
Arp never updated his anti-BBT quasar hypothesis since the 1960s, back when high powered telescopes were in their early stages. Now his hypotheses are easy to test--and subsequently reject.
The Big Bang doesn't violate the First Law of Thermodynamics. All apparent violations are allowed for by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
You need to peel yourself away from metaresearch if you want to be taken seriously. You're doing exactly what creationists do to "disprove" evolution--poke holes in it without actually providing a good alternative.
The scientific community is in agreement about the Big Bang. All you need to do is find a source other than ICR or metaresearch.