General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "What the Supreme Court Got Right" by Glenn Greenwald. [View all]BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)and narcissist on a DEMOCRATIC PARTY SUPPORTING site. Jeezus! Do I need to remind you "Democrats" of this glaring fact in each and every one of my posts??
Take a good hard look at the dates of his books. Bush was selected president in 2000 and re-selected in 2004. Greenwald only became critical of Bush when it was profitable and popular to do so, jumping on the "I hate Bush, too!" bandwagon, and not before. Big whoop. Almost every Republican who voted and re-voted for Bush disliked him by 2006, too. And you want to give his credibility high marks for that? What a low bar you set.
But you go on ahead and continue to give this Libertarian hypocrite credence, because despite his "criticism" of Bush LONG AFTER he voted for Duhbya, he was 200% on Duhbya's side - and all his blogs reflect that. And I would've happily accepted his BEEP-BEEP-BEEP backtracking as legit had he not pontificated on getting Republican and TeaBagger favorite Ron Paul elected as president - and that was in 2008. So, you want to buy that oil from that particular salesman? FINE. But don't expect other people to be as stupid.
The others you listed are just more attempts by Greenwald-apologists to defuse and distract from that Libertarian charlatan who, had he the power, we'd be in more dire straits today than under "his president" Bush. And just in case you've never heard of that idiom, with Greenwald, even a broken clock is correct twice a day.