Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
11. It did happen on his turf
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 12:41 AM
Apr 2014

But Reagan was more likely the beneficiary, rather than a plotter(can you picture him personally plotting ANYTHING?)

Nixon seems more plausible(possibly in collusion with LBJ, since Bobby had forced Johnson out of the race and was the only Democrat with a realistic chance of getting nominated who had a real shot at stopping ol' Milhous).

I always kind of figured that, once LBJ knew he wouldn't get another term, he was bound and determined to make sure NO Democrat would replace him. That, to my mind, is the most plausible explanation for his insistence of forcing Humphrey to defend the war in his campaign speeches all the way to Chicago(since he knew Humphrey would make himself unelectable by doing that).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Cesar Chavez: I saw th...»Reply #11