General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Look, I suck. I get that. [View all]JohnnyRingo
(20,930 posts)I don't think that's what I take issue with. I just wonder what the brand new issue will hit the fan next week, as there seems to be an endless supply of outrage from specific people these days. I have to wonder how these particular malcontents even cope with day to day life, considering how easily set off they are and their seemingly constant state of furor.
It's different when a multitude of DUers voice discontent over legitimate gripes, I concur with the less conspiratorial of them, but when the same person runs what amounts to a weekly newsletter about what steams him at the moment and how Obama's to blame, it attracts attention and causes many to question the motive. As I pointed out, no matter the issue, he always threads Obama's name into the text as the primary antagonist. Not sometimes, or not even most of the time, but every single time.
In this case, the poster even casually cemented the Fox News talking point that the numbers for the ACA were fudged, and more people are without insurance than before he took office.
For the record, I didn't get that upset when I discovered Bush was tapping everyone's phone after 9/11. I figured it was a trade off for our life in the information age. What I didn't like was his purposeful policy of circumventing FICA courts when compiling evidence to use in court. I may be naive, but I don't believe that's happening now. At least I haven't heard of it.