Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

deurbano

(2,986 posts)
31. Have to agree to disagree.. That hasn't been my kids' experience.
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 10:00 PM
Apr 2014

I did prefer the K-8 aspect of the private school (although there are also advantages--like band and orchestra-- of large, comprehensive middle schools)... and the smaller class size (that more money could buy). And, my son couldn't continue in Chinese immersion because it didn't yet exist in the public schools at his higher grade level. Fortunately, my daughter was able to continue in immersion, and she already knew her 3rd grade Chinese teacher from the private school. (The teacher had switched at the same time...) The teachers weren't better at the private school, but kids who had any challenging issues were "counseled out" by third grade, so the teachers had fewer "issues" to deal with. Of course, the school had a very selective screening process, so most kids weren't admitted in the first place.

My adult daughter is severely disabled, and she would never have been admitted to any "general ed" private school. We had to fight for her rights in public school (for inclusion, accessibility, adequate speech therapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy, etc.), but she had no right to attend private school at all. She eventually ended up at UC Berkeley, another public school.

Public schools aren't perfect. (The private school was far from perfect, too, and way too expensive-- even with the financial aid.) But, public schools have to take all kids. (Which is a good thing.) Some of those kids bring very big issues with them, and that is likely to be reflected in their test scores. (And blamed on their teachers and schools.) But (where I live, anyway), the public schools are very transparent about achievement test scores. The school and grade level scores are very easy to find. That is not true of local private school test results.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Well, it meets his apparent standards for good policy. vi5 Apr 2014 #1
He did say that. madfloridian Apr 2014 #2
Correction vi5 Apr 2014 #15
payback time for the corporate owners of our government officials nt msongs Apr 2014 #3
I'd rather see rewards for colleges that Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2014 #4
Agreed completely Xyzse Apr 2014 #5
Thank you madfloridian ... wavesofeuphoria Apr 2014 #6
"does anyone in the DOE know ANYTHING about teaching, learning to teach, learning?" madfloridian Apr 2014 #7
Very sad, and it is overwhelming to think about how we'll reverse all the mess...sigh. Jefferson23 Apr 2014 #8
Oh noes, "high pressure testing" woolldog Apr 2014 #9
No, they reflect practice on testing procedure and test skills. madfloridian Apr 2014 #10
Bullshit. woolldog Apr 2014 #11
My children had MUCH less testing (and test prep) at their elite and very expensive private school. deurbano Apr 2014 #16
And? woolldog Apr 2014 #17
Same reason you're telling us your life story. deurbano Apr 2014 #21
The additional details are to provide context. deurbano Apr 2014 #22
I went later than you, and went to catholic school. woolldog Apr 2014 #25
The teachers are only "imported" because the "fancy" school is Mandarin immersion. deurbano Apr 2014 #29
The public schools are so bad now woolldog Apr 2014 #30
Have to agree to disagree.. That hasn't been my kids' experience. deurbano Apr 2014 #31
This is all very interesting, but im not sure what you're disagreeing with me on. woolldog Apr 2014 #32
I disagree that: "The public schools are so bad now." That's not my kids' experience in comparison deurbano Apr 2014 #35
Ok woolldog Apr 2014 #36
No, my kids go to school in San Francisco. deurbano Apr 2014 #39
I would be willing to bet that you took far fewer tests than students in public schools dsc Apr 2014 #19
Every week, grades 1-8, in my catholic grammar school woolldog Apr 2014 #23
Nice post, Rick Berman Starry Messenger Apr 2014 #38
Please ignore the grammatical errors in my post. woolldog Apr 2014 #24
You might walk into a wall with your nose that high in the air MattBaggins Apr 2014 #27
Yes, because wanting kids to get the same quality education I did woolldog Apr 2014 #28
Not sure about that KamaAina Apr 2014 #20
then would you like to explain how my autistic son passed 6th, 7th, and 8th grade math and not liberal_at_heart Apr 2014 #33
You're comparing the general American population to third world elites. LeftyMom Apr 2014 #37
My thoughts on your post and my experiences professionaly: The Straight Story Apr 2014 #40
This message was self-deleted by its author madfloridian Apr 2014 #12
Okay, the more testing the better. madfloridian Apr 2014 #13
Go Team! 1000words Apr 2014 #14
Don't know who he's going to get to do it; 76% of the higher ed workforce is part-time. Starry Messenger Apr 2014 #18
Obama has stabbed students and teachers in the back too much. I will not vote for ANY Democrat Orlandodem Apr 2014 #26
Education is the reason I am an independent now. liberal_at_heart Apr 2014 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama to reward colleges ...»Reply #31