Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
63. Personally...
Thu May 1, 2014, 07:36 PM
May 2014

Personally, I'd like nothing better than to see Wendy Davis win the Governor's mansion. But I don't believe that wishes will come out that way. So I have to take a look like the rest of us, at the Strategic, instead of tactical, situation.

But for the sake of argument, let's pretend that Wendy did win the Governor's mansion. She would have a hostile Rethug Legislature, and would be powerless to enact the reforms she wanted to vis a vie Choice without them. So best case scenario, gridlock in the Texas Legislature. Worst case, she has to sign legislation that they can pass without her signature by over-riding her veto. We know she's far more pro gun than a majority of Liberals, so she would have minimal support through the non traditional media on many of those bills that Texas would certainly submit for her approval, bills designed to make the recent Georgia gun bill look wimpy by comparison.

The Strategic I mentioned a paragraph above. We are in real danger, and don't let the cheerleaders fool you, very real danger of losing the Senate. Right now, eight toss up races exist, if the Rethugs win half of them, just four, they win control of the Senate. Republicans in control of the House, and Senate, means that the last two years of the Obama administration is shot to hell. The best we can hope for is that he remains strong and veto's the legislation put before him, forget reforming anything, or liberalizing any policy. Now obviously, that is the most important strategic situation facing us as Democrats. Nothing can matter more this election than holding control of the Senate.

Now, with that Strategic reality facing us, and acknowledging that we have limited funds and abilities, where do we dedicate our assets? If we try and win everything including races like Wendy's where there is no real hope, we will lose the Senate, and a lot more. If we ignore the battles we can't win, and focus on those we can, we stand a fair chance of holding onto the Senate by one vote, one.

Now, that reality is one we can't afford to lose. In the last two years of President Obama's term, we may have the opportunity to appoint a Supreme Court Justice. Imagine the Justice we'd be stuck with should the Rethugs control the Senate. With that reality in mind, I say that the one thing we can't afford to lose is the Senate. It's more important than showing Wendy how much we appreciate her courageous stand. it's more important than putting up a good, if token fight, for a district in which the Rethug will be re-elected. It's more important than anything we can try and do.

The larger the majority we can manage in the Senate, the easier it will be to handle the Judicial nominees, and especially a Supreme Court Justice should one open up. But if we lose the Senate, we should all take to praying that nothing happens until such time as we can regain the Senate.

Sun Tzu calls this sort of situation, Death Ground. It is literally not figuratively victory or death. Because if we lose the Senate, we start the battle for the White House in 2016 from behind, and with nearly unlimited funds via the two Supreme Court decisions, the Rethugs will have a much better chance in 2016 than we would like to think. This election is setting up the biggest battle any of us has ever imagined. This November, the ground will be lain for the battle for the White House and control of the Government in 2016. We just can't afford to lose the Senate. I can't say that strongly enough. I'm sorry that means not supporting a woman who is obviously as worthy as Wendy Davis, but worthy doesn't mean capable of victory, and the Rethugs will hold the Texas Legislature, there is no way we could afford to fight the various individual battles to take that back. I'm sorry, but that is the reality we are facing.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think Wendy's a better bet in TX Jackpine Radical Apr 2014 #1
Perhaps the DGA needs to hear from the membership of the Party. Skidmore Apr 2014 #2
I would think so. This really surprised me. madfloridian Apr 2014 #12
Sorta like Christie and NJ all over again. We are our own worst enemy. nt kelliekat44 Apr 2014 #47
That's why I don't contribute to any Dem party groups. elleng Apr 2014 #3
Sez it all:"minority and young voters who embrace the party. But that's a tough audience to inspire" UTUSN Apr 2014 #42
Dems can win in SC and Georgia but not in Texas? KamaAina Apr 2014 #4
Last polling I saw madville Apr 2014 #11
Obama came much, much, much closer to winning in those states than he did in Texas dsc Apr 2014 #13
It was Romney 60%, Obama 39% if I remember right madville Apr 2014 #21
Obama was not as popular as Hillary Clinton in TX - TBF Jun 2014 #68
A fine way to keep it in the loser's box... TreasonousBastard Apr 2014 #5
Wendy Davis is too liberal for them? nadinbrzezinski Apr 2014 #6
She fairly moderate madville Apr 2014 #14
I'm not sure, but I suspect they are afraid of a very high profile... TreasonousBastard Apr 2014 #15
the problem in Texas is two fold or actually likely three fold dsc Apr 2014 #7
I remember that pretty much all the Governor's power was... TreasonousBastard Apr 2014 #18
Howard Dean instituted a 50 state policy. SheilaT Apr 2014 #8
you are right in general, however they need to make judicial decisions regarding finite funds DrDan Apr 2014 #41
With party support like that, it's true. herding cats Apr 2014 #9
That would be an awful mistake to not support her: Jefferson23 Apr 2014 #10
New party slogan DJ13 Apr 2014 #16
live in a republican area in wisconsin-run into this all the ding dong time dembotoz Apr 2014 #25
The proclaimed goal of the party woo me with science Apr 2014 #57
Well, they've just declared themselves an utterly ridiculous, Warpy Apr 2014 #17
This really pisses me off maddezmom Apr 2014 #19
donate directly to her campaign JI7 Apr 2014 #20
It wasn't that long ago that Dem's held Texas malokvale77 Apr 2014 #22
There's plenty of pessimism about Wendy Davis, right here at DU. (nt) Paladin Apr 2014 #23
Isn't that the truth! kentauros Apr 2014 #53
Tx Dems should be running on accepting Medicade, the ADA, but they are not. Some consultant... northoftheborder Apr 2014 #24
Accepting the Medicaid expansion was on the Texas Democratic Party primary ballot Gothmog Apr 2014 #29
That's good, but I don't hear this mentioned in speeches; but... northoftheborder Apr 2014 #43
I am a Wendy supporter and I know that this will be a tough race Gothmog Apr 2014 #26
"Those who insist something can't be done liberalhistorian Apr 2014 #27
That's why I give ZERO to the DGA..... Swede Atlanta Apr 2014 #28
Nelson? in FL? God help us... HooptieWagon Apr 2014 #30
Getting rid of Scott is priority #1 davidn3600 Apr 2014 #38
"and if she loses it'll be the lefties' fault, and never ours! NEVER! OURS!" MisterP Apr 2014 #31
Good point. madfloridian Apr 2014 #32
"because WE win elections, not the voters--even when we refuse to try" MisterP Apr 2014 #34
even when we refuse to try justabob Apr 2014 #39
but if you get more people voting we might win--or even see PRIMARIES! MisterP Apr 2014 #58
"And if she wins it'll be in spite of the lefties rather than because of them." n/t JoeyT Apr 2014 #35
Seems they might as well say to her to give up...she doesn't have a chance. madfloridian Apr 2014 #33
It's okay. We're used to it. blogslut Apr 2014 #36
+100. On our own. If Abbott becomes TX governor, he'll make you miss Perry. Paladin Apr 2014 #48
Screw the DGA, Wendy Davis can do this on her own then... Firebrand Gary Apr 2014 #37
Okay, WHICH Democrat would you prefer DGA NOT support? brooklynite Apr 2014 #40
South Carolina n2doc Apr 2014 #45
2nd closest governor's race in the country in 2010 tabbycat31 May 2014 #65
Would have been better if they had not made it public. madfloridian Apr 2014 #46
Announcing that you think the Republicans are a shoo in is campaigning Bluenorthwest Apr 2014 #49
Exactly right. madfloridian Apr 2014 #54
No it isn't brooklynite Apr 2014 #55
It doesn't help that the entire media.. ananda Apr 2014 #44
Texas is on the verge of becoming a purple state. DGA needs to grow a spine. liberal_at_heart Apr 2014 #50
No, it isn't. Savannahmann Apr 2014 #52
I'm afraid you're right DavidDvorkin Apr 2014 #59
Last polls I saw from mid-April madville May 2014 #61
Fuck it. We Texas Democrats know we're on our own. (nt) Paladin May 2014 #62
Personally... Savannahmann May 2014 #63
Fuck it. We Texas Democrats know we're on our own. (nt) Paladin May 2014 #64
We here at DU can change this in 24 hours. oldandhappy Apr 2014 #51
So people who don't support DGA are going to convince them to change their priorities...that'll work brooklynite Apr 2014 #56
In Texas we'll go it alone if we have to - TBF Jun 2014 #67
I'm not disparaging you...I'm making a cold, hard calculation. brooklynite Jun 2014 #69
Here is the address oldandhappy Apr 2014 #60
I hope the DGA doesn't need contributions from dems - TBF Jun 2014 #66
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dem governor's group DGA ...»Reply #63