Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think it's a fool-proof deterrent to further crime. GeorgeGist May 2014 #1
You're right--they should kill shoplifters and jaywalkers, too. Orrex May 2014 #2
Yeah, because shoplifting and jaywalking causes the death of others. blueamy66 May 2014 #10
It wasn't an argument. Orrex May 2014 #11
Don't agree. blueamy66 May 2014 #13
You are appealing to emotionalism, which is a poor basis for a judicial system. Orrex May 2014 #16
I will admit that I find the "botched attempts" a bit barbaric... blueamy66 May 2014 #18
That's the call for vengeance, though. Orrex May 2014 #24
Let me think about what you wrote. blueamy66 May 2014 #36
ANSWER ME NOW DAMMIT1!!!!!!!!!!!1!!! Orrex May 2014 #37
"You are appealing to emotionalism ..." oldhippie May 2014 #39
Sure it's allowed, but that doesn't make it persuasive. Orrex May 2014 #43
so, answer barbarism with more barbarism. i find that barbaric. spanone May 2014 #185
Well, if you want to control crime... NuclearDem May 2014 #25
I never said that I wanted to control crime... blueamy66 May 2014 #87
So nations without the death penalty don't punish murderers? Scootaloo May 2014 #160
But not a deterrent to others, which us what the deterrent theory morningfog May 2014 #3
It works well doesn't it? Capt. Obvious May 2014 #7
Hmmmm H. Cromwell May 2014 #15
The fact that you justify someone being tortured to death. NuclearDem May 2014 #26
If causing suffering is wrong, then causing suffering is wrong Scootaloo May 2014 #161
And what of the cases where someone is wrongly executed? alphafemale May 2014 #213
So is life in jail. But states with the death penalty have higher murder rates than states that Maraya1969 May 2014 #42
Every statistic says otherwise Shoulders of Giants May 2014 #55
Unfortunately... Orrex May 2014 #59
It's not 100 percent effective Shoulders of Giants May 2014 #61
Sad but true (nt) Orrex May 2014 #67
Nope, intaglio May 2014 #158
For being fool-proof, it sure seems to have swept you up... n/t Scootaloo May 2014 #164
Strangely enough, despite having the Death Penalty - crime still happens. tenderfoot May 2014 #214
Boy it makes arguing easier when you just assign your opponents the basest motives el_bryanto May 2014 #4
If the death penalty doesn't save money or deter crime Shoulders of Giants May 2014 #56
It's a process of elimination. DanTex May 2014 #58
And if you were to talk with someone who supported the death penalty el_bryanto May 2014 #60
It depends the person. DanTex May 2014 #65
Which makes them bloodthirsty? nt el_bryanto May 2014 #66
Personally, I wouldn't use the term bloodthirsty ("eager to shed blood"), but it is arguable. DanTex May 2014 #69
That's my problem with this line of argument el_bryanto May 2014 #70
I'm much more comfortable with "revenge" than "bloodthirst", but the term I would use DanTex May 2014 #71
That's azmom May 2014 #83
It is vengence. Bloodthirtsy,I grant you, is more sensationalist. morningfog May 2014 #94
Call me the avenger azmom May 2014 #95
Not shame based. None of the other arguments withstand scrutiny. morningfog May 2014 #93
And there's the kicker - in an imperfect legal system, which is *every* legal system, inevitably nomorenomore08 May 2014 #204
Spot on. Puzzledtraveller May 2014 #102
I see executing someone like Ted Bundy like killing a rabid animal. hobbit709 May 2014 #5
Did he kill anyone while he was incarcerated? Orrex May 2014 #31
He escaped custody once and went on another spree. hobbit709 May 2014 #33
That's a great argument for more secure incarceration Orrex May 2014 #35
He also stood a very good chance of being acquitted at the time of his escape Major Nikon May 2014 #46
DP Calista241 May 2014 #6
except when they're not, but since when do we worry about government killing innocents? unblock May 2014 #51
I believe the DP in an insentive to murder. GOPee May 2014 #78
Thanks for telling me what I believe. cherokeeprogressive May 2014 #8
Strictly speaking, it's not telling you what you believe Orrex May 2014 #34
I'll try. cherokeeprogressive May 2014 #76
Thanks. Orrex May 2014 #81
As I ask upthread; do nations that lack the death penalty, not punish murderers? Scootaloo May 2014 #162
No, I don't support killing as revenge or vengeance. blueamy66 May 2014 #9
And what about the fact that, thanks to inherent human imperfection, a certain number of innocent nomorenomore08 May 2014 #205
Ah, yet another 'either or' ultimatum MO_Moderate May 2014 #12
Ironically, you condemn an "appeal to emotion" while appealing to emotion. Orrex May 2014 #19
Dollars and cents have nothing to do with my argument MO_Moderate May 2014 #45
"I was only responding to the weak anti death penalty claim that it is cheaper to keep them alive" Major Nikon May 2014 #47
Wow MO_Moderate May 2014 #48
So please do elaborate if you don't like someone else making reasonable assumptions Major Nikon May 2014 #50
You seem to believe that I don't understand your position on this. Orrex May 2014 #49
What do you tell to these people? Since we are into appeals to emotion nadinbrzezinski May 2014 #148
Hard to say what I would tell those people MO_Moderate May 2014 #169
So you think our legal system is flawless enough that virtually 100% of those on death row nomorenomore08 May 2014 #207
So the governor of Colorado exonerating a death penalty victim nadinbrzezinski May 2014 #217
"It may cost much more to house and execute, but it does not have to." nomorenomore08 May 2014 #206
Whatever, if it makes you feel morally superior.... Throd May 2014 #14
The battle to determine who is the reigning ... JoePhilly May 2014 #64
... Inkfreak May 2014 #82
Could not have azmom May 2014 #84
I have to laugh at those who lob the "moral superior" label while claiming the morningfog May 2014 #173
No merit it prevents future killing by an individual? REP May 2014 #17
it also stopped the wrongly executed from committing any murders CreekDog May 2014 #172
Then give me an alternative that prevents recidivism whatthehey May 2014 #20
And what about the estimated 4% or more of people on death row who are actually innocent? nomorenomore08 May 2014 #208
absolutley, everyone supporting DP is exactly that two dimensional Sheepshank May 2014 #21
All the replies in this thread prove my point. Not one has offered a viable alternative reason than morningfog May 2014 #22
Except you have ignored recidivism continually whatthehey May 2014 #23
As noted above, that's not actually an argument in favor of capital punishment Orrex May 2014 #27
Better supervision and control in prison. NuclearDem May 2014 #32
and? RandoLoodie May 2014 #28
Well, you're wrong in one point. Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #29
Death Penalty Not Needed to Prevent Prison Murder morningfog May 2014 #98
Oh dear.... Jeff In Milwaukee May 2014 #30
OK ... oldhippie May 2014 #38
I don't think that's true Prophet 451 May 2014 #40
I was thinking of the azmom May 2014 #85
It is about punishment not revenge. MicaelS May 2014 #41
interesting slippery slope argument. i suppose we'll want to abolish prisons entirely soon? unblock May 2014 #52
I am anti-mandatory LWOP too. morningfog May 2014 #54
Abosolutely not. No way. MicaelS May 2014 #74
The death penalty is dying. I predict it will end in the US within the next 10 years. morningfog May 2014 #79
You are correct about point one. MicaelS May 2014 #80
I get that. morningfog May 2014 #88
What would you do with a convicted murderer who kills again, in prison? MicaelS May 2014 #91
That rarely happens. The murder rate of COs in prison is much much lower than for morningfog May 2014 #92
Look at the countries with the DP, admire them? nt Logical May 2014 #86
I had no idea AnalystInParadise May 2014 #113
Glad you are getting the message! nt Logical May 2014 #153
The death penalty is barbaric and grossly unjust (and racist) in its application YoungDemCA May 2014 #44
+1000000 nomorenomore08 May 2014 #209
Yes, I support killing as revenge and I make no apologies. PeteSelman May 2014 #53
I don't support killing as revenge. Shoulders of Giants May 2014 #57
You can't avoid the innocent people issue that easily. DanTex May 2014 #62
You might want to rethink this. NuclearDem May 2014 #68
I see it as justice served. 840high May 2014 #105
I love when a psychic posts on DU. JoePhilly May 2014 #63
I sensed that you were going to post that. Orrex May 2014 #72
You're late ... JoePhilly May 2014 #73
LOL! oldhippie May 2014 #77
Any Nation that practices capital punishment cannot call itself a ladjf May 2014 #75
Not hundreds of US executions, 39 last year, 42 in each of the two previous years Bluenorthwest May 2014 #215
You are correct on the numbers. But, the exact number is irrelevant ladjf May 2014 #218
There is nothing azmom May 2014 #89
Are you saying justice isn't done in countries that have abolished the DP? n/t Violet_Crumble May 2014 #189
In my view, justice is not azmom May 2014 #190
I live in a country where the DP was officially abolished in 1973... Violet_Crumble May 2014 #192
These azmom May 2014 #199
I agree but believe there is a time and place for revenge that can involve the DP arely staircase May 2014 #90
Ok AnalystInParadise May 2014 #96
Then what are your reasons for supporting state-sanctioned killing? morningfog May 2014 #97
No I have thought it through very clearly AnalystInParadise May 2014 #104
The death penalty has absolutely nothing to do with justice baldguy May 2014 #112
That is your opinion AnalystInParadise May 2014 #115
How was the torture that occured in Oklahoma justice? baldguy May 2014 #151
Got it. Your concept of justice is revenge. morningfog May 2014 #114
Not at all....... AnalystInParadise May 2014 #116
"Justice is watching the criminal die for his horrible crimes" morningfog May 2014 #118
Wow judgemental and charming AnalystInParadise May 2014 #124
Should Hitler have faced the death penalty? Skip Intro May 2014 #99
No. morningfog May 2014 #100
Well hold on a minute. Skip Intro May 2014 #101
You are confusing the issue. morningfog May 2014 #106
Question was among a larger expressed thought on the subject. Skip Intro May 2014 #110
I don't agree with you. When 840high May 2014 #107
Because you want to avenge their deaths. morningfog May 2014 #109
You seem to confuse the terms revenge and justice. AnalystInParadise May 2014 #117
You are letting your mask slip again. morningfog May 2014 #119
What mask might that be? AnalystInParadise May 2014 #121
Figure it out. morningfog May 2014 #123
Yes I do know who I am AnalystInParadise May 2014 #125
You know who are and what you are here to do. morningfog May 2014 #129
Please continue AnalystInParadise May 2014 #133
Ignore. morningfog May 2014 #139
So wait AnalystInParadise May 2014 #143
"Cmon tough guy or girl." Texasgal May 2014 #178
It's the man up for 840high May 2014 #126
Good luck friend AnalystInParadise May 2014 #128
Good thing I'm going to bed. Sweet dreams. 840high May 2014 #131
It isn't always the jury that decides. morningfog May 2014 #132
About as fucked up AnalystInParadise May 2014 #134
Get bent. morningfog May 2014 #138
I agree. But humans are emotional animals. flvegan May 2014 #103
Ummm...so? Katashi_itto May 2014 #108
Many here try to confuse the issue with failed logic and false arguments. morningfog May 2014 #111
My argument is not false nor is my logic. AnalystInParadise May 2014 #120
Punishment is revenge, genius. morningfog May 2014 #122
No I am logical AnalystInParadise May 2014 #127
No it's not. You 840high May 2014 #130
I get that a lot of people disagree with me, and often. I'm not even trying to change their minds. morningfog May 2014 #137
So only you are right AnalystInParadise May 2014 #144
The basis can be to azmom May 2014 #170
How is "pay with your life" not a statement of revenge? morningfog May 2014 #171
Pay with your life is a punishment azmom May 2014 #174
Death is not a punishment. morningfog May 2014 #175
We azmom May 2014 #186
From wiki azmom May 2014 #187
It's entertaining that you believe you just presented a logical argument tkmorris May 2014 #135
I fully acknowledge I am only speaking my own opinion. AnalystInParadise May 2014 #141
It's been abundantly clear, though you don't present it as opinion tkmorris May 2014 #152
In that case I guess I support revenge. Demobrat May 2014 #136
Hit a nerve? morningfog May 2014 #140
Post removed Post removed May 2014 #142
I already said I want revenge Demobrat May 2014 #145
Well then I assume you will be called a monster AnalystInParadise May 2014 #146
I assume I will be called both. Demobrat May 2014 #147
Oh, the better, better, better comments weren't personal? morningfog May 2014 #149
I told you what you wanted to hear. Demobrat May 2014 #150
If there is no deterrent Riftaxe May 2014 #154
Deterrence, when discussing sentencing, generally refers to the deterrent effect prior to morningfog May 2014 #155
I don't think you understand what "deterrent" means Scootaloo May 2014 #163
DP should have tiers Politicalboi May 2014 #156
Life in prison without parole PumpkinAle May 2014 #157
I love the defensive nature of some of these posts. U4ikLefty May 2014 #159
No, they're probably mad at being subjected to intellectual dishonesty. Shandris May 2014 #165
They are mad at the construct of my point, but morningfog May 2014 #166
I thought I spelled out QUITE CLEARLY that I'm not pro-DP. That doesn't mean... Shandris May 2014 #167
You did make it clear. You also mentioned past support. morningfog May 2014 #168
Headache = excuse U4ikLefty May 2014 #193
I get it - your OP is the flipside of accusing anti-DPers are cuddling criminals. aikoaiko May 2014 #176
Offer another justification that withstands facts and logic. morningfog May 2014 #177
A measured execution is not the most punitive response possible and it is not the least. aikoaiko May 2014 #183
That make zero sense. U4ikLefty May 2014 #194
Life with eligibility of parole is not a guarantee of parole and release. morningfog May 2014 #196
I will admit that I am not as evolved as some of you in this thread. I still am hung up on revenge. Rex May 2014 #179
I still don't see what's wrong with revenge, either .... oldhippie May 2014 #182
Well if unconditional love and forgiveness are the enlightened way, I still have a long ways to go. Rex May 2014 #184
I think azmom May 2014 #191
reckoning oneofthe99 May 2014 #188
And, to be honest, I get that. morningfog May 2014 #197
I agree, because I can also see the barbarism of purposly killing someone. Rex May 2014 #211
I totally agree with azmom May 2014 #212
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2014 #180
Let me add this to the discussion nadinbrzezinski May 2014 #181
An 86 year old woman was beaten to azmom May 2014 #195
It simply does not change depending on what the crime charged is. morningfog May 2014 #198
It certainly has to azmom May 2014 #200
The state used to be able to put juveniles to death. morningfog May 2014 #201
I hope you are azmom May 2014 #202
"we all have different views on things." bobduca May 2014 #210
A six year old was raped, had his head caved in, nadinbrzezinski May 2014 #216
the death penalty is barbaric, and there are a lot of barbaric people responding in this thread.... mike_c May 2014 #203
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If you support the death ...»Reply #171