Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If we don't vote... [View all]nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)100. If you understand widening the discussion
To messaging and engagement as disparaging efforts to increase voting in a place where you might get one more person to the polls, you got my number.
Beyond ridiculous, but keep claiming what has not happened.
At this point expected and comical.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
112 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I hope you are not calling DUers "rotten fruit". That would be disrespectful in the extreme.
riqster
May 2014
#50
Yep. Right below your post is an excellent example of what we are up against here.
riqster
May 2014
#30
"run a "dog person" against a "cat person," to increase excitement for the pageantry" LMFAO
L0oniX
May 2014
#112
Excellent point. The "Voting can't change anything" arguments don't stack up - voting's our best
Chathamization
May 2014
#34
So telling people to *get involved in the system is voter suppression?*
nadinbrzezinski
May 2014
#84
Even when you do vote, we still end up with those idiots in office or worse
Exposethefrauds
May 2014
#47
With D's like Pryor, Landrieu, and Manchin the 1% does not even have to own all the D's
Exposethefrauds
May 2014
#49
Agree more people need to be involved early on and be ready to be attacked by those who
Exposethefrauds
May 2014
#55