Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Arizona law would criminalize being lewd or annoying on the Internet [View all]
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/03/30/arizona-law-would-criminalize-being-annoying-on-the-internet/
As summarized by the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund, The bill is sweepingly broad, and would make it a crime to communicate via electronic means speech that is intended to annoy, offend, harass or terrify, as well as certain sexual speech. Because the bill is not limited to one-to-one communications, H.B. 2549 would apply to the Internet as a whole, thus criminalizing all manner of writing, cartoons, and other protected material the state finds offensive or annoying.
The bill is currently awaiting Governor Jan Brewers signature, and the Media Coalition, which defends first amendment rights in the media, has sent her a letter outlining some of the problems with the legislation.
H.B. 2549 would make it a crime to use any electronic or digital device to communicate using obscene, lewd or profane language or to suggest a lewd or lascivious act if done with intent to annoy, offend, harass or terrify, the letter notes. Lewd and profane are not defined in the statute or by reference. Lewd is generally understood to mean lusty or sexual in nature and profane is generally defined as disrespectful or irreverent about religion or religious practices.
It appears that the Arizona law could criminalize the recent interview in which Meghan McCain daughter of Arizona senator John McCain told Playboy, Im strictly dickly. I cant help it. I love sex and I love men. Or any random atheist saying, There is no god provided some official was prepared to conclude it was done with the intention of annoying believers.
As summarized by the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund, The bill is sweepingly broad, and would make it a crime to communicate via electronic means speech that is intended to annoy, offend, harass or terrify, as well as certain sexual speech. Because the bill is not limited to one-to-one communications, H.B. 2549 would apply to the Internet as a whole, thus criminalizing all manner of writing, cartoons, and other protected material the state finds offensive or annoying.
The bill is currently awaiting Governor Jan Brewers signature, and the Media Coalition, which defends first amendment rights in the media, has sent her a letter outlining some of the problems with the legislation.
H.B. 2549 would make it a crime to use any electronic or digital device to communicate using obscene, lewd or profane language or to suggest a lewd or lascivious act if done with intent to annoy, offend, harass or terrify, the letter notes. Lewd and profane are not defined in the statute or by reference. Lewd is generally understood to mean lusty or sexual in nature and profane is generally defined as disrespectful or irreverent about religion or religious practices.
It appears that the Arizona law could criminalize the recent interview in which Meghan McCain daughter of Arizona senator John McCain told Playboy, Im strictly dickly. I cant help it. I love sex and I love men. Or any random atheist saying, There is no god provided some official was prepared to conclude it was done with the intention of annoying believers.
30 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Arizona law would criminalize being lewd or annoying on the Internet [View all]
Amerigo Vespucci
Apr 2012
OP
Agree on Tucson, considering that Flag started as a real estate rip off it has improved somewhat.
Downwinder
Apr 2012
#28
There should be penalties for stupid laws that are clearly unconstitutional.
LiberalFighter
Apr 2012
#17
There are a THOUSAND churches i am going to apply this to the moment it passes.
slampoet
Apr 2012
#23