General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Let's Try It This Way...Under What Instances, Is It Okay To Praise The President On DU ??? [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)Speaking of dumbass gripings, calling someone's POV "silly" is a perfect example of a pretty lame approach to discussion. What a way to marginalize a person, and their point of view:
I don't like your perspective, ergo your questions are "silly."
Glenn Greenwald's opinions are not "fact." They aren't "correct" either--GG does not have standing to say what's a constitutional violation, or what isn't--unless he's morphed into five Supreme Court justices before our eyes.
But see what you just did? You laid out a scenario where you're right, and everyone else is wrong--because you say so, based on a flawed assertion. You've made yourself judge, jury and executioner, and then you get mad at the "shrill" (hmmmmmmm) people who disagree with your "correct" (so sez you) opinion.
There's no "arguing" against anything like that. You've already made up your mind. And you, with a chip on your shoulder, take issue with others who -- looking at what you're dishing -- have a chip on theirs.