General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why Is Network Television Afraid of Admitting Many of America's Terror Attacks Are 'Right Wing [View all]DirkGently
(12,151 posts)Last edited Tue Jun 10, 2014, 11:03 AM - Edit history (1)
When it started it cropping up, here and there, yesterday, I noticed the headlines for (politically opinionated) blogs and so forth put that fact up front. Networks not only kept it out of the headlines, but barely mentioned it all.
I'm not much for bashing the reliability of "main stream media" in general -- blogs and so forth can be even worse -- but the fact that a the signature symbol for a public, vocal, U.S. political faction was invoked by terroristic spree killers targeting cops seems worth mentioning to me.
Can you imagine if they'd left an anarchy symbol or a peace sign or a rainbow flag on the bodies of their victims?
At what point does the automatic conservative entitlement to the benefit of the doubt fail? When do we get to talk about the problem with their entire point of view, not with a few "lone nuts?"
Not when they talk about "Second Amendment remedies, or when they bring guns to rallies, apparently. Not when they aim rifles at federal officials. Not when they claim the right to waltz into the Gas 'n Sip with rifles and laugh at anyone who feels "uncomfortable with that."
And now, not when they drape their f'ing FLAG over people murdered in cold blood?