Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Lionessa

(3,894 posts)

9. It's a really good question.

Reply to JCMach1 (Original post)

Wed Dec 21, 2011, 07:22 AM

Dec 2011

I have a real problem deciding. I totally see both sides of the argument. For my stuff, I just try to make sure anything is pre-paid, and it's watermarked, but not so much that someone couldn't work around it. Then I take a deep breath and let it go. No copyright. Not worth the time and expense to assure it isn't used elsewhere.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Death of Intellectual Property [View all] JCMach1 Dec 2011 OP

The big problem with US laws about intellectual property aletier_v Dec 2011 #1

they are trying to protect their middle man status ejpoeta Dec 2011 #4

Not many stars on youtube aletier_v Dec 2011 #5

Ray William Johnson JCMach1 Dec 2011 #7

Also, even setting aside technology for a minute... JCMach1 Dec 2011 #3

I have long said that Are_grits_groceries Dec 2011 #6

Prisoners of history, slaves to the future The2ndWheel Dec 2011 #8

It's a really good question. Lionessa Dec 2011 #9

Food for thought. PETRUS Dec 2011 #10

I think the historic model was good, but now is unsustainable. NYC_SKP Dec 2011 #11

Hollywood came into being to evade Edison's patents starroute Dec 2011 #14

But would they be able to profit from their creativity? mythology Dec 2011 #13

I've never been a fan of the "profit" motive. CanSocDem Dec 2011 #15