Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bobduca

(1,763 posts)
88. Herpa Derp
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 11:54 PM
Jun 2014

Last edited Sun Jun 29, 2014, 01:28 AM - Edit history (1)

if you are going to join the loyalty-brigade pop-and-lock squad your non-sequitur accusations need to be better than that!

The problem with drones lies with the rules of engagement for their use. Maedhros Jun 2014 #1
Brace yourself...get ready to be called "babykiller". cheapdate Jun 2014 #2
But this is not an "either or" quesiton. It is a "whether at all" question. morningfog Jun 2014 #7
I don't have an answer to the "whether at all" question. cheapdate Jun 2014 #62
Yes, turning killing into a video game with no moral component whatchamacallit Jun 2014 #3
+1 SomethingFishy Jun 2014 #17
+1 whatchamacallit Jun 2014 #21
Amused to Death is one of my all time favorites Lucinda Jun 2014 #26
Brilliant is a great description.... think Jun 2014 #29
I wasn't sure if anyone would know what it was... SomethingFishy Jun 2014 #31
How very cool! I'd love to meet him. Lucinda Jun 2014 #35
More relevant today than ever... SomethingFishy Jun 2014 #36
Sadly, this board is far from liberal now. So is the Dem Party. n/t cui bono Jun 2014 #100
But...but...but... Lancero Jun 2014 #25
The news I have read shows some of the pilots quaker bill Jun 2014 #113
Certainly makes it easier to rationalize our involvement in a crime. 1000words Jun 2014 #4
Manned aircraft are flying over Iraq, too. morningfog Jun 2014 #5
Well, no actually... Kelvin Mace Jun 2014 #6
A poem for you, by Thomas Merton . . . Journeyman Jun 2014 #8
+1 xchrom Jun 2014 #9
Not killing is better than either. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2014 #10
Yes. 840high Jun 2014 #77
Boots on the ground lunatica Jun 2014 #11
I think you are wrong. Savannahmann Jun 2014 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Jun 2014 #13
There are more reputable lines of work woo me with science Jun 2014 #14
wow. UNREC m-lekktor Jun 2014 #15
Why don't you support PBO? Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #16
~facepalm~ Marrah_G Jun 2014 #33
I don't support him when I disagree. morningfog Jun 2014 #82
Herpa Derp bobduca Jun 2014 #88
That is your argument? Warren Stupidity Jun 2014 #98
"Wow. Unrec" is worthy of argument? Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #99
You think drones will end the "War on Terror"? SomethingFishy Jun 2014 #18
Better why? So we can covertly kill at will, minimizing blowback and costs at home? TheKentuckian Jun 2014 #19
It minimizes American casualties Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #20
Only from a highly privileged perspective and then if dealing death is TheKentuckian Jun 2014 #22
Like coffee without caffeine. You can drink it all day and not get the shits. Gravitycollapse Jun 2014 #41
Exactly Puzzledtraveller Jun 2014 #23
And what about the violence, oppression, dislocation, and murder carried ouy by ISIS? cheapdate Jun 2014 #72
What about the violence, oppression, dislocation, disenfranchisement, and murder of the puppet TheKentuckian Jun 2014 #78
excellent post, and wise grasswire Jun 2014 #83
I see. cheapdate Jun 2014 #84
"Battle not with monsters lest ye become one." CrispyQ Jun 2014 #104
drones just give the illusion of clean hands. WE are the merchants of their misdeeds bigtree Jun 2014 #24
And what would Hildy write about this, I wonder? historylovr Jun 2014 #37
K & R Thinkingabout Jun 2014 #27
American weapons are best when used moderately. countryjake Jun 2014 #28
K&R Jamaal510 Jun 2014 #30
That is a thought provoking piece there. I am thinking about your excerpt: freshwest Jun 2014 #42
The use of drones is merely expedient, and shady as hell IMO. Lucinda Jun 2014 #32
The incessant propaganda grows old. woo me with science Jun 2014 #34
Does my post say war is good? Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #43
Yes, by attempting a lame and disgustingly invalid "lesser of two evils" argument, woo me with science Jun 2014 #44
If there are two options Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #45
No, there aren't. woo me with science Jun 2014 #46
Your attacks on Obama are transparent. Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #47
Right on cue. woo me with science Jun 2014 #48
Cue on right. Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #49
That was predictable, too. woo me with science Jun 2014 #50
With all this predictability, you should change your name to Miss Cleo. Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #51
Wow. "In the mean time, those of us who aren't blinded by racism...." woo me with science Jun 2014 #52
wow. they ran through the shtick 4 posts! KG Jun 2014 #64
That was really low, lame, and ugly. You should delete your smear. Comrade Grumpy Jun 2014 #53
Do you deny that PBO has been attacked by racists since his presidency began? Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #54
Sure he has. But that doesn't make criticism of his policies racist. Comrade Grumpy Jun 2014 #55
bullshit, bullshit grasswire Jun 2014 #57
Your "arguments" are laughably inept. Maedhros Jun 2014 #69
Who says no one is "worked up over the bombing itself"? cui bono Jun 2014 #73
What site? Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #75
You emotarian, you. morningfog Jun 2014 #94
You should delete your post. CrispyQ Jun 2014 #106
Project much? bobduca Jun 2014 #89
Is that the new catch phrase? Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #91
You are combative and transparent bobduca Jun 2014 #92
Signature strikes are not ethical. Maedhros Jun 2014 #67
Do those strikes become ethical Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #68
No. As is said in my first response, the problem is not the technology Maedhros Jun 2014 #71
So there's nothing inherently wrong with drone strikes Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #74
Collective psychological punishment of entire villages and regions (http://www.livingunderdrones.org woo me with science Jun 2014 #70
how about we just send boots annm4peace Jun 2014 #38
Sounds much better to me /nt think Jun 2014 #103
Hear Hear! Alex P Notkeaton Jun 2014 #39
As Slavoj Zizek puts it, this is like coffee without the caffeine, soda without the sugar... Gravitycollapse Jun 2014 #40
Far more sanitary way to kill them pesky furrners. Warren Stupidity Jun 2014 #56
Far less risky for our servicemen and women. Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #87
Like I said, sanitary furriner extermination. Warren Stupidity Jun 2014 #93
don't drones require spotters on the ground? grasswire Jun 2014 #58
No they don't, they have cameras that relay back to the operator Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #59
how does a camera identify a terrorist? nt grasswire Jun 2014 #60
How does a surveillance camera read the text messages on your phone as you peruse through a store? Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #61
here, for your edification... grasswire Jun 2014 #65
Surely there is an immeasurable amount of intelligence proceeding drone strikes Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #66
Remember, they changed the definition woo me with science Jun 2014 #63
They remember, they just want everyone else to forget so they can spin the fairy tales of goodness TheKentuckian Jun 2014 #76
I heart this post for its brutal honesty. woo me with science Jun 2014 #79
This is one of the most amoral positions I have ever seen taken on DU Bluenorthwest Jun 2014 #80
So manned aircraft are somehow not as bad as unmanned ones? Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #86
A reasonable, logical and ethical question... countryjake Jun 2014 #81
Well, it costs less money and less US blood. JEB Jun 2014 #85
If a country is going to insist on waging war, then it damend well SHOULD cost that country! markpkessinger Jun 2014 #112
We are paying a huge price for using drones the way we do. JEB Jun 2014 #114
Nope. Zero credit. Bonobo Jun 2014 #90
Drones are not better than boots. Orsino Jun 2014 #95
Death from above is never justified. mattclearing Jun 2014 #96
Your use of absolutes diminishes the value of your post. Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #97
If you say so. nt mattclearing Jun 2014 #110
... SammyWinstonJack Jun 2014 #101
For whom? rug Jun 2014 #102
No, "we" are NOT "all in agreement"! scarletwoman Jun 2014 #105
So boots on the ground is better than an unmanned plane in the sky? Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #107
What part of "NO U.S. military action" do you not get? (nt) scarletwoman Jun 2014 #108
You're painting yourself into a corner Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #109
Yes I believe POTUS is a good man but.... Jasana Jun 2014 #111
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Give Obama Credit: Drones...»Reply #88