General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hey "some" men of DU [View all]William769
(55,147 posts)On Tue Jul 1, 2014, 08:28 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Hey "some" men of DU
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025181214
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
I understand the sentiment, but go fuck yourself is a violation. Disruptive, hurtful, rude, OTT, and otherwise inappropriate. Please, we don't need this disruptive META in GD. Please hide.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Jul 1, 2014, 08:34 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Fuck that, alerter. This site has been subjected to so much misogynist bullshit since DU 3 started, much of it left to stand by juries, and lately it has increased noticeably. It is only right to let women fight back. Fair is fair.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Have absolutely no problem with this post.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It needed to be said, I am glad it hot said, and there is no way in hell I would vote to hide this. Here's to you boston bean :clapping:
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Methinks the alerter doth protest too much. Hey, alerter, are you one of those "some men"?
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Under most circumstances, I'd vote to hide. But this is a response to blatant sexism. Recommend that the poster herself edit last line.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
For transparency, I was juror #5.