Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Gangs and swarms [View all]bravenak
(34,648 posts)100. My bad.
Everyday, new strange rules.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
318 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It takes 5 people (of any gender) to make a gang (one G.U., or Gang Unit)
DisgustipatedinCA
Jul 2014
#1
It's the same "group" that a handful of hosts gleefully ignore the alerts of.
PeaceNikki
Jul 2014
#54
How sexist is this "Wo-mansplaining?" We couldn't possibly understand because we have a penis.
Electric Monk
Jul 2014
#13
Lovely post, but I don't see what it has to do with mine. Want to read a really interesting post?
Electric Monk
Jul 2014
#205
Thanks for womansplaining that to me. I'm playing BainsBanes game back at her, is what I'm doing. nt
Electric Monk
Jul 2014
#207
Some people don't see the irony. Others can laugh at it. I prefer to laugh. nt
Electric Monk
Jul 2014
#238
Not the most important issue, but I've never seen the word "punctuations" before.
merrily
Jul 2014
#26
We all have semicolons tattooed somewhere on our bodies. We got them in our initiation ceremony.
Squinch
Jul 2014
#51
But the ones posting sexist crap and those who defend them and alert on those objecting to it
kcr
Jul 2014
#6
Nah, it's the "hive mind" (kidding). BTW, that particular poster has been getting away w/crap
KittyWampus
Jul 2014
#128
I think to a certain extent, because I'm a straight white guy, I get to be just an individual
nomorenomore08
Jul 2014
#35
not just prudent but, decent. The decent thing to have done was own it and apologize
Tuesday Afternoon
Jul 2014
#140
And after refusing to self delete- he PMd a host asking them to lock it for them despite other hosts
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#80
and another one, wherein a host judges a "group" or swarm of DUers at about post 44 or so:
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#91
There were 5-6 alerters on that - and instead of seeing that it was bothering more DUers, it was
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#111
You want another WOW- the OP PMs a host asking them to lock - knowing it is against consensus....
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#220
yeah, he actually called it a lynching and a witch hunt- pretty funny imagery considering
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#267
That is a wow, making hosting decisions on his own post without consensus should be bannable
Bjorn Against
Jul 2014
#231
Tht is a pretty good summary of what has happened. Very sad he enlisted a fairly respected DUer
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#234
Yep- we need transparency, so all of DU can see the hosts sitting in judgment of alerters-
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#126
Oh I finally got an answer- apparently they assumed I was posting pro NSA....
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#149
Yeah- it's pretty hilarious that people who go on about the NSA and spying are making secret lists!
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#189
Does the Host know that it was the OP which mentioned the Name of the DU Member they trashed
JI7
Jul 2014
#177
It is yet another case of anger and blame misdirected at alerters, instead of the person who very
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#198
OMG- please send me that! I got quite a few PMs from jurors who said I was being "swarmed" by alerts
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#94
wow- crappy hide. Sorry that some judge the poster and not content here.....
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#113
It is a curious word choice, at the least. Almost implies insecurity or paranoia, to me.
nomorenomore08
Jul 2014
#34
It was only at his request. He pm'd a host and asked them to lock it as a favor
PeaceNikki
Jul 2014
#45
Oh no, one rogue host locked that thread with absolutly no consensus but based on
boston bean
Jul 2014
#46
I'm in there fighting my ass off being with no response from the one who locked it
boston bean
Jul 2014
#49
To me,l ocking that thread was a no-brainer and I'm just surprised it took so long. nt
pinboy3niner
Jul 2014
#55
If your opinion is to let everyone discuss whatever the hell they want to discuss,
Sheldon Cooper
Jul 2014
#139
Funny- I have noticed Earl G stepping in with some mighty fine locks the last few months- as well as
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#208
I think I saw three in a short span recently- all pretty awful OPS with many alerts
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#309
"personal hosting services" - yep , it's like their own concierge that they call when they take a
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#115
That particular thing has been going on forever. Seriously, it only shows how antiquated these guys'
Squinch
Jul 2014
#61
This thread is a perfect example of what is unfortunately referred to as the swarm
elias7
Jul 2014
#76
As women we "swarm" collectively. No free thinking needed, just follow the leader.
sheshe2
Jul 2014
#119
the hosts here lable people who alert as troublemakers- it's never the OP, unless it is by someone
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#121
"Sewing circle" has a much more feminine ring to it. We should petition for
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2014
#116
Men are forceful and show leadership where women are dictatorial and bossy....
Rowdyboy
Jul 2014
#120
Wait, was the person saying it just wasn't important the same DUer who first suggested
redqueen
Jul 2014
#181
One may only imagine the disconnect felt by the half-wit who is unable to extrapolate ideas
LanternWaste
Jul 2014
#153
It's whining when they disagree with your point. Much the way this thread is meta only because
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#193
Seriously? Maybe you should have checked yourself before you irresponsibly created this thread.
Vattel
Jul 2014
#169
You haven't shown that the term is more frequently used to refer to groups of women.
Vattel
Jul 2014
#175
I will also post to you, because you carry the banner for feminists to a large extent-
KittyWampus
Jul 2014
#180
yes, a host confirmed to me - they ignore people who are not perceived as being concerned enough
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#219
Interesting nexus of misogynists and Snowden fans. Apparently it carries over into the GD Hosts.
KittyWampus
Jul 2014
#178
this is a democratic board, it reminds me of people excusing saying nasty things about Democratic
JI7
Jul 2014
#266
false equivalence indeed. i peeped at the old Mortos thread and saw all these great women who
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#270
Thank you for doing the leg work! Sometimes the arguments here kill me...
likesmountains 52
Jul 2014
#188
You do know I wrote that before the member did the search on my own use of the word
BainsBane
Jul 2014
#297
Yes, I do know that you wrote that before she did the search on your use of the word.
NaturalHigh
Jul 2014
#299
And when you google AverageJoe90 and sexism this is the second thing that comes up:
XemaSab
Jul 2014
#275
Sorry to say, but none of these are really hurting my position, though, TBH.
AverageJoe90
Jul 2014
#283
Gangs and swarms on DU: Exhibit A, it's self-referemtial, and we're posting in it
Electric Monk
Jul 2014
#282