Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Gangs and swarms [View all]BainsBane
(57,516 posts)129. Nothing much
The Supreme Court just ruled it's legal to discriminate against groups of Americans based on an employer's religious preference. You know, all those women swarming Hobby Lobby and interrupting the rights of Americans to not give a fuck.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
318 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It takes 5 people (of any gender) to make a gang (one G.U., or Gang Unit)
DisgustipatedinCA
Jul 2014
#1
It's the same "group" that a handful of hosts gleefully ignore the alerts of.
PeaceNikki
Jul 2014
#54
How sexist is this "Wo-mansplaining?" We couldn't possibly understand because we have a penis.
Electric Monk
Jul 2014
#13
Lovely post, but I don't see what it has to do with mine. Want to read a really interesting post?
Electric Monk
Jul 2014
#205
Thanks for womansplaining that to me. I'm playing BainsBanes game back at her, is what I'm doing. nt
Electric Monk
Jul 2014
#207
Some people don't see the irony. Others can laugh at it. I prefer to laugh. nt
Electric Monk
Jul 2014
#238
Not the most important issue, but I've never seen the word "punctuations" before.
merrily
Jul 2014
#26
We all have semicolons tattooed somewhere on our bodies. We got them in our initiation ceremony.
Squinch
Jul 2014
#51
But the ones posting sexist crap and those who defend them and alert on those objecting to it
kcr
Jul 2014
#6
Nah, it's the "hive mind" (kidding). BTW, that particular poster has been getting away w/crap
KittyWampus
Jul 2014
#128
I think to a certain extent, because I'm a straight white guy, I get to be just an individual
nomorenomore08
Jul 2014
#35
not just prudent but, decent. The decent thing to have done was own it and apologize
Tuesday Afternoon
Jul 2014
#140
And after refusing to self delete- he PMd a host asking them to lock it for them despite other hosts
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#80
and another one, wherein a host judges a "group" or swarm of DUers at about post 44 or so:
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#91
There were 5-6 alerters on that - and instead of seeing that it was bothering more DUers, it was
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#111
You want another WOW- the OP PMs a host asking them to lock - knowing it is against consensus....
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#220
yeah, he actually called it a lynching and a witch hunt- pretty funny imagery considering
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#267
That is a wow, making hosting decisions on his own post without consensus should be bannable
Bjorn Against
Jul 2014
#231
Tht is a pretty good summary of what has happened. Very sad he enlisted a fairly respected DUer
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#234
Yep- we need transparency, so all of DU can see the hosts sitting in judgment of alerters-
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#126
Oh I finally got an answer- apparently they assumed I was posting pro NSA....
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#149
Yeah- it's pretty hilarious that people who go on about the NSA and spying are making secret lists!
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#189
Does the Host know that it was the OP which mentioned the Name of the DU Member they trashed
JI7
Jul 2014
#177
It is yet another case of anger and blame misdirected at alerters, instead of the person who very
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#198
OMG- please send me that! I got quite a few PMs from jurors who said I was being "swarmed" by alerts
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#94
wow- crappy hide. Sorry that some judge the poster and not content here.....
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#113
It is a curious word choice, at the least. Almost implies insecurity or paranoia, to me.
nomorenomore08
Jul 2014
#34
It was only at his request. He pm'd a host and asked them to lock it as a favor
PeaceNikki
Jul 2014
#45
Oh no, one rogue host locked that thread with absolutly no consensus but based on
boston bean
Jul 2014
#46
I'm in there fighting my ass off being with no response from the one who locked it
boston bean
Jul 2014
#49
To me,l ocking that thread was a no-brainer and I'm just surprised it took so long. nt
pinboy3niner
Jul 2014
#55
If your opinion is to let everyone discuss whatever the hell they want to discuss,
Sheldon Cooper
Jul 2014
#139
Funny- I have noticed Earl G stepping in with some mighty fine locks the last few months- as well as
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#208
I think I saw three in a short span recently- all pretty awful OPS with many alerts
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#309
"personal hosting services" - yep , it's like their own concierge that they call when they take a
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#115
That particular thing has been going on forever. Seriously, it only shows how antiquated these guys'
Squinch
Jul 2014
#61
This thread is a perfect example of what is unfortunately referred to as the swarm
elias7
Jul 2014
#76
As women we "swarm" collectively. No free thinking needed, just follow the leader.
sheshe2
Jul 2014
#119
the hosts here lable people who alert as troublemakers- it's never the OP, unless it is by someone
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#121
"Sewing circle" has a much more feminine ring to it. We should petition for
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2014
#116
Men are forceful and show leadership where women are dictatorial and bossy....
Rowdyboy
Jul 2014
#120
Wait, was the person saying it just wasn't important the same DUer who first suggested
redqueen
Jul 2014
#181
One may only imagine the disconnect felt by the half-wit who is unable to extrapolate ideas
LanternWaste
Jul 2014
#153
It's whining when they disagree with your point. Much the way this thread is meta only because
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#193
Seriously? Maybe you should have checked yourself before you irresponsibly created this thread.
Vattel
Jul 2014
#169
You haven't shown that the term is more frequently used to refer to groups of women.
Vattel
Jul 2014
#175
I will also post to you, because you carry the banner for feminists to a large extent-
KittyWampus
Jul 2014
#180
yes, a host confirmed to me - they ignore people who are not perceived as being concerned enough
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#219
Interesting nexus of misogynists and Snowden fans. Apparently it carries over into the GD Hosts.
KittyWampus
Jul 2014
#178
this is a democratic board, it reminds me of people excusing saying nasty things about Democratic
JI7
Jul 2014
#266
false equivalence indeed. i peeped at the old Mortos thread and saw all these great women who
bettyellen
Jul 2014
#270
Thank you for doing the leg work! Sometimes the arguments here kill me...
likesmountains 52
Jul 2014
#188
You do know I wrote that before the member did the search on my own use of the word
BainsBane
Jul 2014
#297
Yes, I do know that you wrote that before she did the search on your use of the word.
NaturalHigh
Jul 2014
#299
And when you google AverageJoe90 and sexism this is the second thing that comes up:
XemaSab
Jul 2014
#275
Sorry to say, but none of these are really hurting my position, though, TBH.
AverageJoe90
Jul 2014
#283
Gangs and swarms on DU: Exhibit A, it's self-referemtial, and we're posting in it
Electric Monk
Jul 2014
#282