Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
Sun Aug 3, 2014, 02:48 PM Aug 2014

Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution Interests Me. [View all]

It reads, with regard to the powers of the President:

Section. 3.

He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.

The boldfaced portion is of most interest to me right now. Does anyone know how this part has been used in the past and whether it might be applied to today?
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What's the point of conveneing them if they won't be coming to an agreement on a bill? PoliticAverse Aug 2014 #1
Thank you. That's what I was looking for. MineralMan Aug 2014 #6
Good question! 2naSalit Aug 2014 #2
The Constitution specifically gives the President the power to convene Congress, you think PoliticAverse Aug 2014 #7
Actualy 2naSalit Aug 2014 #10
What if they fail to appear? Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2014 #3
That's an excellent question. MineralMan Aug 2014 #9
Assuming that it's the Republicans in the House that don't appear resulting in PoliticAverse Aug 2014 #14
I wonder if the Sgt. at Arms has ever had to actually do that? n/t Chan790 Aug 2014 #21
The Senate's Sergeant at Arms did arrest Senator Bob Packwood in 1988... PoliticAverse Aug 2014 #23
Then we start passing shit like there's no tomorrow. nt msanthrope Aug 2014 #17
So he can adjourn the Congress and say come back in a month. MohRokTah Aug 2014 #4
Is there disagreement between the House and Senate right now MineralMan Aug 2014 #8
There always seems to be. MohRokTah Aug 2014 #15
Sure. Igel Aug 2014 #19
"and in Case of Disagreement between them" MohRokTah Aug 2014 #20
This notion was already decided by the USSC when they vacated Obama's appointments Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2014 #22
Only if a Multi-National Corporation approves it first FreakinDJ Aug 2014 #5
DUzy!!! 2naSalit Aug 2014 #12
It's been done MannyGoldstein Aug 2014 #11
The article on the Turnip Day session (link from the link) is interesting and inspiring. Shrike47 Aug 2014 #16
Truman was OK with confrontation MannyGoldstein Aug 2014 #18
Sort of the same thing where many governors can call for a "special session" davidn3600 Aug 2014 #13
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Article II, Section 3 of ...