Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
Tue Aug 5, 2014, 09:56 AM Aug 2014

CNN launches Argumentum ad hominem attack (argument directed at the person) at Hamas leader. [View all]

Last edited Tue Aug 5, 2014, 10:36 AM - Edit history (2)

Let me break this down.

CNN morning propaganda talking head PTH introduces segment by sagely noting the amount of hate spreading throughout the Middle East, teasing a segment about what dear viewer may interpret as a segment on how not to hate people so easily.

Au contraire, dear viewer.

Said PTH instead says she will play...hesitates*...nay, will READ hate speech from some unknown date by Hamas leader and spokesman Osama Hamdan, the usual religious hate zealotry so common on all sides and all places. Breathlessly with nodding head said PTH introduces head Chief PTH Wolf Blitzer to replay cleverly cut portions of an interview from yesterday Wolf "had" with Hamdan.

In the clip Wolf is seen bullying Hamdan, introducing the classic logical fallacy attack by asking Hamdan to defend his clipped words from a video recorded years ago, over the protests of Hamdan who says he knows what Wolf is up to and knows the words and no need to play video clip.

*(Note that the PTH had thought she was going to play a video and instead was supposed to read the words, the video belonged to Wolf, the Chief)

The video is played, of course, Wolf has a script to stick to.

Cut back to the interview and Wolf completes the argue mention ad attack by insisting Hamdan take back the words....demonize the enemy, attack their character as humans, ignore the current issues.

"Wolf, you have to be fair....", Hamdan is cut off.

"Is there any point in having Hamas even at the negotiating table in Cairo?", asks the morning PTH, cashing her check with a self satisfied toss of her coiffured head.

Followed up by a fair an balanced panel of three people all supporters of Israel and it's propaganda, moderated by same PTH.

Followed up by a cut to a Wall Street credit card commercial...propaganda sponsored by Bank of America.

Making money is fun and easy if you can find a cable news TV PTH job, but only the finest actors are accepted. The ones that also vitally come with no souls whatsoever. Hard to find actors with both, hence the immense pay scale.

All this is to cover for the FACT that Hamas has negotiators in Cairo as we speak, and Israel....does NOT.

Denial is not just a river in Egypt, it flows like wine in the rivers of American news propaganda.

Now that is how propaganda is done, folks, in the modern age.

Edit: apparently the guy is not even a leader, he is in Doha and CNN picked him up, for an interview that Wolf set up, to set up the whole propaganda master script.....he is good. Hamdan is using a dog whistle to the religious zealots in Palestine, just as politicians in America use dog whistles to their religious zealots.

One is condemned, the other is ignored. Both are to be condemned otherwise it is just the same old hate wrapped in another shiny package.

44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lets see what Osama Hamdan has said over the past couple of years. hack89 Aug 2014 #1
You posted the words I refused to....interesting. Fred Sanders Aug 2014 #2
Because you refuse to accept the implications of such words from such people hack89 Aug 2014 #5
I think propaganda stinks, I have a good nose for stink. My burden. Fred Sanders Aug 2014 #6
Do you deny that Hamdan said what is in my post? nt hack89 Aug 2014 #7
Indeed, Sir: Holding A Man To Account For His Previous Words Is Not Argumentm Ad Hominem The Magistrate Aug 2014 #13
Holding him up falsely as anyone of importance is not propaganda? Attacking the person to segue Fred Sanders Aug 2014 #15
Why Do You Insult Mr. Hamdan By Insisting He Is Un-Important, Sir? The Magistrate Aug 2014 #20
Did you really just compare Iamthetruth Aug 2014 #27
Have Some Coffee Before You Post, Sir The Magistrate Aug 2014 #31
With you there... Fred Sanders Aug 2014 #34
He is the Hamas representative in Lebanon, Hamas was elected government of Palestine. Fred Sanders Aug 2014 #32
Nice To See You Can Google, Sir, And That You Acknowledge The Man's Significance The Magistrate Aug 2014 #36
Like Sarah Palin and Ted Cruz? Snark in a Magistrate is not good form. Fred Sanders Aug 2014 #39
You Will Have Your Little Joke, Sir.... The Magistrate Aug 2014 #41
I didn't see this morning's panel show but I saw the interview of Hamden by wolf yesterday aint_no_life_nowhere Aug 2014 #24
I just do not think the amplified hate of one not vital to the process man should hold up peace. Fred Sanders Aug 2014 #25
So DU has vapors when an obsure American blogger posts on the Times of Israel site hack89 Aug 2014 #30
I doubt that peace will be held up as a result of a Wolf Blitzer interview aint_no_life_nowhere Aug 2014 #35
Then why amplify his voice? The whole piece had to be seen to put this in context, the context of Fred Sanders Aug 2014 #37
It is complex, I know. Takes a wee bit of study. For those that can keep pace: Fred Sanders Aug 2014 #3
Because nothing of the sort was directed at Netanyahu. WinkyDink Aug 2014 #4
. MohRokTah Aug 2014 #8
Clearly you missed the hack on The Cycle yesterday malaise Aug 2014 #9
Why do people not see through the obvious propaganda, malaise, why are people so intent on Fred Sanders Aug 2014 #10
Laziness and indifference malaise Aug 2014 #11
When children are killed, piled up like cordwood, they still remain lazy and indifferent..I may hurl Fred Sanders Aug 2014 #12
As long as it's not their children malaise Aug 2014 #14
That Was Not An Accident, Ma'am: That Was a Crime The Magistrate Aug 2014 #16
We know that malaise Aug 2014 #17
I Understand That, Ma'am The Magistrate Aug 2014 #21
You stated it very well Sir malaise Aug 2014 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author Fred Sanders Aug 2014 #18
Your words should be copied and put into the war crime indictment for this act of terror. Fred Sanders Aug 2014 #19
Correct Sir, and thank you for saying it. bemildred Aug 2014 #23
And In This Context, Sir 'Not Giving a Shit' Is Low Enough And then Some.... The Magistrate Aug 2014 #38
Quite enough, on both sides, yes. bemildred Aug 2014 #40
Seriously Iamthetruth Aug 2014 #26
Seriously, no one is defending anyone, but no one is discussing that both sides agree civilian death Fred Sanders Aug 2014 #28
Hamas lover! Capt. Obvious Aug 2014 #33
You're defending not only Hamas but the age-old slander of the blood libel. You're sick. nt Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2014 #29
I guess it would be "fair and balanced" if they also had this woman on their show arikara Aug 2014 #42
I strongly disagree. GeorgeGist Aug 2014 #43
I liked how they brought out Dan Rather, complained about how they, CNN were ever so being Fred Sanders Aug 2014 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CNN launches Argumentum a...