Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

bathroommonkey76

(3,827 posts)
44. I wouldn't call it a "scandal"
Sun Apr 8, 2012, 06:17 PM
Apr 2012

You have to look at this from the point of view of the average American. They see politicians as someone they can relate too. The majority aren't going to see someone like Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, or Bill Maher as someone they look up too.

I personally have problems with all three of the ones that I mentioned. Anyone who tells me what to think, or gives me an opinion that disagrees with my faith usually aren't going to make it past my Tivo fast forward button. I'm not saying that I don't respect their opinions; I just don't want to be bullied by some overinflated ego. That's my only gripe with Maher. He seems like a very smart, clever man. I would say that I agree with at least 85% of what he has to say on his show; it's his constant bashing of organized religion that irks me the most. Same could be said for Dawkins and Hitchens (when he was alive). Their egos and intellect are overbearing to the point of me dry heaving.

I will admit that I am a Christian; I'm not ashamed of that fact at all. Heck, all of the candidates that I have voted for in my life claimed to be Christians.

President Obama is on the opposite side of what George Dubya was all about. Dubya seemed to make his Christian beliefs part of his policy; Prez. Obama has never made those statements.




That video is a testament of the deadly ways a Christian radical can influence the American people and world with his policies. Now if President Obama started declaring wars against countries because "God told him too" then I would be reluctant to vote for him again. I doubt that will ever happen. (fingers crossed) lol



I do know that the Grahams are an interesting part of my home state's history. Billy has admitted to being a Democrat in the past. Franklin is the lone rebel of Billy's family. His daughters usually don't have the spotlight, so I have nothing to say about them. Who is it hurting if she let's her opinion out into the public courtyard? If my grandmother told me the same thing would I be offended? Probably not. I would respect her and not bash her for being a close-minded person. It's probably because she is the offspring of Rev. Graham.

I have always liked Billy. My grandmother would read his newspaper column religiously over the years. He has helped bring peace to a lot of people's hearts; that reason alone makes him a decent human being in my book.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Obama is safe Rosa Luxemburg Apr 2012 #1
You didn't hear the list on Obama from Glenn Beck? He's a godless commie, you know! freshwest Apr 2012 #25
Glenn Beck Rosa Luxemburg Apr 2012 #45
The entire GOP should be exorcised! Thom Hartmann does it here: freshwest Apr 2012 #46
Fox "NEWS" reported that the Obama family DID NOT attend easter services. Justice wanted Apr 2012 #32
I wouldn't vote for you either, ya punk-ass. Iggo Apr 2012 #2
what they want is a politician who has a fear for an almighty televangelist. KG Apr 2012 #3
Be afraid, be very afraid. elleng Apr 2012 #4
That's OK. I sure as hell wouldn't vote for Franklin Graham, either. MineralMan Apr 2012 #5
Wasn't she Control-Z Apr 2012 #6
Looked like Billy Graham with a blonde wig on customerserviceguy Apr 2012 #47
Well, I would not vote for a fundie evangelist or his daughter Generic Other Apr 2012 #7
Subtext. This is a Christan nation nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #8
Well, I would not vote for her! LeftishBrit Apr 2012 #9
Watching her now nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #10
Eh, who cares? It's her vote and she can cast it how she likes RZM Apr 2012 #11
+1 Exactly. nt zappaman Apr 2012 #16
the article notes most Americans would not vote for an atheist. provis99 Apr 2012 #12
That's silly. Many of the worst fundies are atheists. Because by what JC said, they're toast! freshwest Apr 2012 #26
She is entitled to her belief (no pun intended) and can vote any way she pleases rustydog Apr 2012 #13
It's funny how she says she would not vote for a man who is an atheist. treestar Apr 2012 #20
sure sounds like she has a messed up view of god and religion Angry Dragon Apr 2012 #14
Huh. Wonder if her bigotry extends to Mormonism and other non-Judeo-Christian religions?. . . Journeyman Apr 2012 #15
Ya think? nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #17
How far does this go? treestar Apr 2012 #18
Analyzing her quote no_hypocrisy Apr 2012 #19
What's so glorious about a religion that demands fear of God? lunatica Apr 2012 #21
She is free to vote for whomever she wants to vote for. proud2BlibKansan Apr 2012 #22
I would never vote for a Jew hating televangelist. Dawson Leery Apr 2012 #23
I would never LiberalFighter Apr 2012 #24
I wouldn't vote for the spawn of a grifter Tom Ripley Apr 2012 #27
If they really had a "fear of god" hobbit709 Apr 2012 #28
So she can't imagine being good without fear of punishment. JDPriestly Apr 2012 #29
A majority of Americans wouldn't elect an atheist as President. bathroommonkey76 Apr 2012 #30
That's the real scandal. DavidDvorkin Apr 2012 #37
I wouldn't call it a "scandal" bathroommonkey76 Apr 2012 #44
Oh good. Glad that's settled. a la izquierda Apr 2012 #31
she rode the gravy train of her snake-oil salesman daddy RainDog Apr 2012 #33
yeah, and I wouldn't vote for you or any family member so I guess we're even. WHO CAERS? n/t ladywnch Apr 2012 #34
Neither would I..if he/she were a Republican. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2012 #35
Her vote, her choice ... I have a bias on who my vote will never go to myself. Raine Apr 2012 #36
Christians are the biggest threat faced by our nation bowens43 Apr 2012 #38
Well, considering today's views on religion, RebelOne Apr 2012 #39
And I wouldn't vote for a Graham malaise Apr 2012 #40
I doubt she'd vote Spirochete Apr 2012 #41
That's her choice. Guess some might call it discrimination - lynne Apr 2012 #42
Who gives a flying shit what this moron has to say ! RagAss Apr 2012 #43
So what, that doesn't make her a "Neanderthal" Ter Apr 2012 #48
Australopithecine, then DavidDvorkin Apr 2012 #53
And I am sure there are folks on DU who wouldn't vote for a fundie of some faith The Straight Story Apr 2012 #49
The reasons for various statements matter RainDog Apr 2012 #55
She has as much right to believe what she believes - Skip Intro Apr 2012 #50
She has a right to her shameful attitudes DavidDvorkin Apr 2012 #54
as I noted above - reasons matter RainDog Apr 2012 #57
Well, a big F----U---- NoodleyAppendage Apr 2012 #51
She's standing up for the family business. This is her INCOME. aquart Apr 2012 #52
exactly. religious charlatans rely on a gullible public RainDog Apr 2012 #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Billy Graham’s daughter: ...»Reply #44