Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Not since the New Deal [View all]
 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
4. Sure.
Sun Apr 8, 2012, 06:22 PM
Apr 2012

There are many, many examples of Obama's attempts to cut Social Security, starting with the naming of the "Deficit Commission" shortly after his inauguration - who's who of Social Security foes led by Alan "Social Security is a milk cow with 310 million tits" to Erskine Bowles, who brokered a deal with Newt Gingrich under Clinton to slash Social Security (Congress wouldn't play along that time). When given the opportunity to strike, during last summer's fully-fake debt crisis, Obama made his move:

Rep. Conyers: Obama Demanded Social Security Cuts--Not GOP


"We then offered an additional $650 billion in cuts to entitlement programs -- Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security."
- Remarks by the President, July 22, 2011

As to Medicare: "According to five separate sources with knowledge of negotiations -- including both Republicans and Democrats -- the president offered an increase in the eligibility age for Medicare, from 65 to 67, in exchange for Republican movement on increasing tax revenues." - Obama Offered To Raise Medicare Eligibility Age As Part Of Grand Debt Deal

This is not what Democrats do.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not since the New Deal [View all] arely staircase Apr 2012 OP
Both sides fundamentally agree on most issues MannyGoldstein Apr 2012 #1
you have a source for either claim? arely staircase Apr 2012 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Apr 2012 #3
Sure. MannyGoldstein Apr 2012 #4
Still pushing ProSense Apr 2012 #5
"did not affect *current* beneficiaries in an adverse way." MannyGoldstein Apr 2012 #6
As i suspected arely staircase Apr 2012 #8
Yep MannyGoldstein Apr 2012 #11
This is key: ProSense Apr 2012 #7
the stark ideological choice Enrique Apr 2012 #9
Well ProSense Apr 2012 #10
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Not since the New Deal»Reply #4