Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
18. Difference is Zimmerman was a private citizen where this case involves the police
Sun Aug 17, 2014, 03:17 PM
Aug 2014

It would have been very difficult for the DOJ to prosecute Zimmerman. There may have been a slight angle they could use claiming Zimmerman violated Trayvon's civil rights. But I don't know if that has ever been applied in that manner to a private citizen who was acquitted of the crime at the state trial.

Typically you only see the feds pursue a case like that if the accused is a police officer, or public official, or government agent of some type and there is evidence of institutional corruption involved. So the DOJ jumped on this because it involves the police.

I think it will more likely lead to truth. Hoyt Aug 2014 #1
The state autopsy didn't mention how many GSW he sustained. AtomicKitten Aug 2014 #10
That would seem to be a critical fact. Glad there will be a 2nd or 3rd autopsy. Hoyt Aug 2014 #12
A blind cat could have come to that conclusion. AtomicKitten Aug 2014 #14
I just want to see some justice for Mike Brown & his family. Little Star Aug 2014 #2
A bigger trouble for a fair trial will be when the police lie their asses off... Cooley Hurd Aug 2014 #3
True, Sir The Magistrate Aug 2014 #16
Well gollygee Aug 2014 #4
Realistically, it's unlikely there will ever be a trial, at least not in criminal court. (nt) enough Aug 2014 #5
I have always thought that there will avebury Aug 2014 #8
That's what people were counting on in the Trayvon Martin case. amandabeech Aug 2014 #11
Difference is Zimmerman was a private citizen where this case involves the police davidn3600 Aug 2014 #18
There is nothing in the law that precludes the Justice Department from amandabeech Aug 2014 #19
It seems pretty certain that McCullogh is not bringing the cop to trial. Jim__ Aug 2014 #6
McCullogh wouldn't bring the invisible Mr. Wilson to trial SwankyXomb Aug 2014 #17
Why do you assume autopsies will be different. LisaL Aug 2014 #7
Just a hunch. Michigander_Life Aug 2014 #9
I read that the Justice Department was asked to do their by the victims family. Only 2 autopsies. jwirr Aug 2014 #13
How much could their findings vary? treestar Aug 2014 #15
There should be minimal to no variation Lurks Often Aug 2014 #21
"Which one will be credible?" - That's what a judge or jury will decide if it goes to trial. n/t PoliticAverse Aug 2014 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Three different autopsies...»Reply #18