Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
Thu Oct 9, 2014, 11:20 AM Oct 2014

When you read "deficit reduction", think "austerity" [View all]

They are, by and large, the same thing.

Now I absolutely understand that there is some political capital to be gained by telling the unlearned that we're reducing deficits.

But I think that the preferred situation is to help folks understand that deficit reduction austerity during a depression (for the 99%) helps only the wealthiest, and is a large part of why most Americans continue to struggle six years after the not-guilty-of-anything-whatsoever bankers crashed the world economy while getting the biggest bonuses ever.

Austerity not only inherently starves the economy at the time when it most needs the help, it also reduces the demand for workers at the time when demand is already at its lowest. It all results in the vulnerable becoming roadkill.

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Are you talking about the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005? n/t JustAnotherGen Oct 2014 #1
Nothing in particular. MannyGoldstein Oct 2014 #4
Already do! K&R 2naSalit Oct 2014 #2
there are two main components; austerity is one; growing economy is the other unblock Oct 2014 #3
A third component is revenue. nt kelliekat44 Oct 2014 #20
K&R liberal_at_heart Oct 2014 #5
We had our chance to balance the budget without austerity. pa28 Oct 2014 #6
It's a way for republicans to get what they want and for democrats to be blameless in liberal_at_heart Oct 2014 #7
Funny how WE always have to compromise. Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2014 #10
Yep you got it. zeemike Oct 2014 #19
The1% should be happy that that they didn't get cuts to SS, Medicare, Medicaid and Food Stamps Dustlawyer Oct 2014 #12
whenever we're threatened with a Peace Dividend, a new war just happens to pop up MisterP Oct 2014 #13
Yes, exactly. rustbeltvoice Oct 2014 #8
Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good (TM) FlatStanley Oct 2014 #11
"Austerity" is supposed to include tax hikes but they only use the word for budget cuts. Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2014 #9
We don't need 'deficit reduction'. It is merely an excuse to falsely tie SS to a deficit it COULD sabrina 1 Oct 2014 #14
I think the Democratic National Platform includes "reducing the deficit". Just sayin" rhett o rick Oct 2014 #15
No they aren't the same thing. Gore1FL Oct 2014 #16
But we always seem to find the money to fight another war n/t BuelahWitch Oct 2014 #17
du rec. xchrom Oct 2014 #18
Why not do like the opposition and just claim victory??? That's why Dems lose so much. nt kelliekat44 Oct 2014 #21
When I read "deficit reduction", I think something else hvn_nbr_2 Oct 2014 #22
I actually look at the context of whatever it is being discussed. TampaAnimusVortex Oct 2014 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»When you read "defic...