Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Public supports travel ban to block Ebola; CDC and White House push back [View all]boston bean
(36,908 posts)44. Well, in your opinion W. Africa is getting so much more attention now that it is here
soooooo..... And if it wasn't here, us god awful people here wouldn't care, which is a bunch of bs, imho.
Listen, I completely 100% disagree with your assertions that travel not be restricted. We won't agree, until one of us changes our minds and it's doubtful mine will ever be changed.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Public supports travel ban to block Ebola; CDC and White House push back [View all]
scarystuffyo
Oct 2014
OP
I wonder how many of them support sending troops, supplies, help and spending $$$ on healthcare in
uppityperson
Oct 2014
#1
Are you suggesting people who think we should restrict visa entry from the epicenter of a deadly epidemic,
Warren DeMontague
Oct 2014
#19
The USA is sending less help, money, people now? Seriously? You really believe less attention is
uppityperson
Oct 2014
#33
That is a pretty wild assumption, that I think more cases here "a good thing"
uppityperson
Oct 2014
#43
Well, in your opinion W. Africa is getting so much more attention now that it is here
boston bean
Oct 2014
#44
Some are, note that word SOME, and plenty are saying we ahould send no aid, spend no
uppityperson
Oct 2014
#32
It's very simple, and it's not about any of the things you keep trying to make it about.
Warren DeMontague
Oct 2014
#37
A ban of anyone identified as having contact with an ebola patient, yes, most certainly
boston bean
Oct 2014
#42
So, he should just "do something" like the idiots on Fox are constantly telling him to do?
Proud Liberal Dem
Oct 2014
#6
This type of sentiment is what enabled implementation of the Patriot Act.
bullwinkle428
Oct 2014
#27
And treating ebola like it's no big deal is what enabled the clusterfuck in West Africa.
Warren DeMontague
Oct 2014
#47
Fear promotes short cuts to simple explanations and simpler sounding solutions.
HereSince1628
Oct 2014
#5
by "more" do you mean one might? That is true, anothernperson might, even 2
uppityperson
Oct 2014
#11
I fear that if we have more cases the administrations reluctance to halt at least some travel
Lee-Lee
Oct 2014
#34
Apparently, some people think that their health, and the health of others, is more important than
Zorra
Oct 2014
#35
Funny how most people are more into direct self-preservation than high-minded
TwilightGardener
Oct 2014
#36