Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Won't people start car pooling, using public transportation, and driving less, thereby djean111 Oct 2014 #1
We already do GummyBearz Oct 2014 #2
Metro Tweedy Oct 2014 #4
I tried GummyBearz Oct 2014 #8
Yuck Tweedy Oct 2014 #16
public transit is nice if done well, but can be a nightmare. My buddy was forced to use it when he dionysus Oct 2014 #55
CalTrain on the SF Peninsula is at capacity Retrograde Oct 2014 #59
A mileage tax is a reasonable thing to replace the gas tax with. ManiacJoe Oct 2014 #3
It's not a "right to privacy" compatible proposal. NutmegYankee Oct 2014 #20
It is neither compatible nor noncompatible. ManiacJoe Oct 2014 #24
How do we know that only distance traveled will be all that's downloaded? NutmegYankee Oct 2014 #28
How do we know that distance will not be the only data stored for later download? ManiacJoe Oct 2014 #35
The people writing the specs will be the manufacturers and Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2014 #38
You think you have privacy now? rogerashton Oct 2014 #26
I don't carry my cellphone with me every place I go. nt NutmegYankee Oct 2014 #27
When you do carry it rogerashton Oct 2014 #37
Check the link rogerashton Oct 2014 #50
I know. I just don't justify further abuses of our civil rights based on these criminal uses. NutmegYankee Oct 2014 #51
How is that an argument? woo me with science Oct 2014 #61
In economic terms, opportunity cost=zero. rogerashton Oct 2014 #64
The government already knows your mileage driven. meaculpa2011 Oct 2014 #40
What yearly inspection? NutmegYankee Oct 2014 #41
What is this yearly inspection you talk about? GGJohn Oct 2014 #42
New York requires yearly inspections for... meaculpa2011 Oct 2014 #45
I guess I live in one of those states that don't require a yearly insp. GGJohn Oct 2014 #46
That still is only giving a pure odometer reading. NutmegYankee Oct 2014 #52
Do you have another plan to maintain the roads? People will still drive on them, there will still be Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #5
Yes GummyBearz Oct 2014 #7
The money was borrowed and state regulation requires that it be repaid within 3 years. Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #10
Do you live in the LA area? GummyBearz Oct 2014 #11
Yes, I think a gradual increase to 20x is acceptable. U.S. PR touts the gas tax as a "pay-as-you-go" Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #14
... GummyBearz Oct 2014 #15
Um, they pay for that excellent public transit through gas taxes and other revenue. You don't get Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #18
fail GummyBearz Oct 2014 #23
Why not just fund them with general fund taxes? NutmegYankee Oct 2014 #22
It really is a pisser. truedelphi Oct 2014 #6
The 50th Anniversary party was a public celebration not a private one. 300,000 people walked the Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #12
Yeah, and five to six years later it was taken out of the hides of poor people truedelphi Oct 2014 #13
Indeed it is the governments job to throw parties for the public. Inaugurations, Fourth of July, Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #17
Anarchy by the rich IIstfeminyes Oct 2014 #9
This "right thing" by "getting hybrids"...how is that exactly? flvegan Oct 2014 #19
Its a personal choice GummyBearz Oct 2014 #21
It's a personal choice for those with the money to make such choices..... Bluenorthwest Oct 2014 #31
Welcome to the thread. GummyBearz Oct 2014 #32
Not an option for everyone. delta17 Oct 2014 #48
People take jobs where they can get them and it is not easy or even plausible to TheKentuckian Oct 2014 #62
yea GummyBearz Oct 2014 #66
when was the last time public transport paid for itself. Travis_0004 Oct 2014 #67
Is it clear that hybrids are good for the environment? rogerashton Oct 2014 #65
If you drive in traffic a lot hybrids are much more efficient than a non hybrid Fumesucker Oct 2014 #25
Inefficient, Costly, Deadly Martin Eden Oct 2014 #29
ok... GummyBearz Oct 2014 #30
I was thinking light rail ... Martin Eden Oct 2014 #33
No need, someone beat you to it NickB79 Oct 2014 #36
Maybe vehicles should be taxed by weight? alarimer Oct 2014 #34
Good point meow2u3 Oct 2014 #39
The sad thing GummyBearz Oct 2014 #43
That's an exploit of a law meant to apply to heavy box trucks and the like. NutmegYankee Oct 2014 #53
Use a stick and carrot approach. mmonk Oct 2014 #44
California can't levy manufacturing taxes on products made outside its state and if Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2014 #49
Then I suppose some sort of tax credit for the purchasers mmonk Oct 2014 #56
If the issue is reduced tax receipts a negative cash flow would exacerbated the issue. nt Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2014 #57
But wouldn't reducing polluting cars be a goal behind the idea in the first place? mmonk Oct 2014 #58
What, you just noticed richie rich stealing everything? lonestarnot Oct 2014 #47
Another reason... bobclark86 Oct 2014 #54
Excellent GummyBearz Oct 2014 #60
Another regressive taxation... Orsino Oct 2014 #63
I don't know how this would work for older cars? LeftyMom Oct 2014 #68
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So we do the right thing ...»Reply #47