Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Democrats only have themselves to blame for upcoming losses [View all]
Democrats only have themselves to blame for upcoming lossesBy Steven Pearlstein at the Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/10/31/democrats-only-have-themselves-to-blame-for-upcoming-losses/
"SNIP........................
Now, on the eve of the election, Democratic candidates find themselves caught in a vicious cycle in which their refusal to embrace and defend their partys brand is discouraging the faithful and turning away the undecided, threatening their election prospects still further. What Benjamin Franklin said of revolutions also applies to political campaigns: Those who dont hang together will surely hang separately.
Advertisement
At a time when outside money, media consolidation and political polarization are all conspiring to nationalize local races, party brands are more important than ever. As Hilton and General Motors and even Procter & Gamble have discovered and Apple has always known having a strong master brand makes it easier and cheaper to succeed with individual products; a weak one drags down the entire portfolio of products. Similarly, in politics, a candidate who embraces and contributes to a strong national party brand already has the foundation for a successful campaign, able to focus limited resources on highlighting her individual qualities and achievements or the weaknesses of her opponent.
As with many businesses, the Democrats branding problem starts with a misunderstanding and misuse of public opinion polls.
To say that there is an over-reliance on research is a gross understatement, laments Srere at Siegel + Gale. Its asking people to tell you things they cant possibly tell you. As Henry Ford put it, if he had asked people what they wanted, they would have told him they wanted a faster horse.
..........................SNIP"
21 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
i know, i mean if we don't win in a place like Texas or Kentucky it's not so simple as saying
JI7
Oct 2014
#12
I see the media has already proclaimed the proper winners. It's like there's no need to vote.
PSPS
Oct 2014
#2
If Grimm beats Recchia in the NY11th it is bwcause we put up an idiot for the job.
hrmjustin
Oct 2014
#3
Polsters never seam to account for us who vote even if we are disgruntled.
Nobel_Twaddle_III
Nov 2014
#17
Democrats who dont stand up and defend democratic party accomplishments and run from the POTUS
Youdontwantthetruth
Nov 2014
#18
