Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The electoral college- the greatest vote suppressor ever [View all]zipplewrath
(16,695 posts)40. And this will get worse with a purely popular vote
The campaigns will go where the votes are. They won't spend 5 minutes chasing 5 votes when the could spend the same 5 minutes chasing 500 votes. To go to Wyoming, or even cater to Wyoming, or North Dakota, will yield little compared to the same amount of effort and resources focused on a much larger, denser, and homogenous region. The same math that has them chasing votes in "battle ground" states will come to bear in a popular vote in terms of density of available votes. Why spend any money on a GOTV effort in rural Kansas when the same money can be spent in Cincinnati generating whole integer multiples of potential voters to the polls.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

I think that many here might be unpleasantly surprised by a popular vote system
Nye Bevan
Nov 2014
#1
congressional districts should have a maximum allowed in any one district
wilt the stilt
Nov 2014
#5