Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
49. UH...DUH: I got that the FIRST time you posted the BB gun
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 03:27 AM
Nov 2014

why don't you post it 10 more times. i don't think you've made your point yet.

There's a video surveillance tape of the incident, GGJohn Nov 2014 #1
Having never been a boy--- Reformed Bully Nov 2014 #5
Anyone determined enough can remove those orange tips. GGJohn Nov 2014 #7
Like the cop that shot a 12 YO Feral Child Nov 2014 #103
Hey, here's a simple solution, GGJohn Nov 2014 #104
OR Feral Child Nov 2014 #108
Ok, I'll play for now, GGJohn Nov 2014 #109
Besides this: Feral Child Nov 2014 #111
So far you haven't dis-proven anything I've said. GGJohn Nov 2014 #121
You'd love to be ignored Feral Child Nov 2014 #213
If you feel you must, GGJohn Nov 2014 #215
Thanks for your permission, Officer. Feral Child Dec 2014 #216
Officer? GGJohn Dec 2014 #218
He didn't say anything untrue phil89 Nov 2014 #130
A child was needlessly killed? n/t ieoeja Nov 2014 #163
It's called "Passion", Feral Child Nov 2014 #212
Good Lord, you nailed it. Number23 Nov 2014 #195
Thanks much, #23! Feral Child Nov 2014 #211
it's easy as hell to coat them with black nail polish TorchTheWitch Nov 2014 #131
Agree. GGJohn Nov 2014 #133
I still don't know if it was a legal "toy" or not TorchTheWitch Nov 2014 #183
Lara Croft? Nuclear Unicorn Dec 2014 #217
Wow! I don't want to live in your kind of country, where children are shot to death by police who sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #184
God, it's amazing how many people are mis-construing my posts. GGJohn Nov 2014 #185
You wouldn't be terrified if the gun in evidence was pointed at you? branford Nov 2014 #191
No, I would not. Damn, whatever happened to 'land of the free, home of the BRAVE?? sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #194
Bully for you. branford Nov 2014 #196
Some people have been known to paint over the orange safety tips. nt Quackers Nov 2014 #21
I live in the neighborhood where this happened. Let me describe it for you- LeftinOH Nov 2014 #97
i lived on west blvd near western. we left in 2003 . belzabubba333 Nov 2014 #113
Great post. cwydro Nov 2014 #120
US law on toy guns, etc. TorchTheWitch Nov 2014 #128
Thank You!! + infinity. MH1 Nov 2014 #135
Oh No - its the picture of the gun again FreakinDJ Nov 2014 #37
And what would you do cwydro Nov 2014 #69
By a child in a play ground - Point my finger and say BANG FreakinDJ Nov 2014 #70
Sure you would. cwydro Nov 2014 #73
You don't know him. Feral Child Nov 2014 #106
Sounds like you haven't lived in our shoes in what people call "bad" neighborhoods. Daemonaquila Nov 2014 #122
I live in a fairly nice neighborhood, but can still handle myself in the bad ones. ieoeja Nov 2014 #160
A 12 y.o. pointed a gun at my head mentalsolstice Nov 2014 #136
because 12 year olds never have real guns and never shoot people with them? onenote Nov 2014 #154
This is not a black and white issue. This is a right and wrong issue. nt Quackers Nov 2014 #71
Evidence Case No. Reformed Bully Nov 2014 #60
How do you know it was unofficially released? GGJohn Nov 2014 #61
Remember the phoney Darin Wilson X-rays FreakinDJ Nov 2014 #63
ABC News GGJohn Nov 2014 #64
The problem with pictures...the early articles talk about scratching off the orange tip. HereSince1628 Nov 2014 #74
It has been shown all over Cleveland media as the gun used by the kid liberal N proud Nov 2014 #84
Yes...we saw it in every thread regarding this shooting. FarPoint Nov 2014 #75
After reading the entire thread with comments ... JEFF9K Nov 2014 #139
I think your going to be disappointed with this yeoman6987 Nov 2014 #2
911 caller twice said it could be fake Garion_55 Nov 2014 #6
And that info wasn't passed on to the responding officers. GGJohn Nov 2014 #8
No - Look at the photo of the 12yr old boy how died FreakinDJ Nov 2014 #42
That has nothing to do with the fact that the child had in his possession, GGJohn Nov 2014 #46
It means nothing to a Bigot Hell Bent on killing Black Children FreakinDJ Nov 2014 #53
I fully support the killing of black children? GGJohn Nov 2014 #56
Naked Hatred for the Killing of Children FreakinDJ Nov 2014 #58
I don't bite into wax fruit and eat it just because it looks real. FarPoint Nov 2014 #76
If you guess wrong about a wax apple, it probably won't kill you Orrex Nov 2014 #88
Its alright Orrex... FarPoint Nov 2014 #94
Thanks, but your analogy is still absurd whether I'm on my game or not. Orrex Nov 2014 #96
I just... Oktober Nov 2014 #91
I'm disappointed in how drastically the profession of law enforcement has depreciated. FarPoint Nov 2014 #93
Lot of cops that you know from back in the day that would tolerate anyone pointing a gun at them? Oktober Nov 2014 #95
Did the kid actually point the gun at the cops? I hadn't heard that. Comrade Grumpy Nov 2014 #125
Soooo cops have to wait for a gun to be drawn and pointed at them before GGJohn Nov 2014 #127
At what point is it ok for a cop to fire at someone? Oktober Nov 2014 #132
If opposing the killing of innocent children makes one a bigot, then DU has really gone to shit. n/t ieoeja Nov 2014 #164
I'm opposed to the killing of all children, GGJohn Nov 2014 #166
Could be fake, also means the gun could be real. branford Nov 2014 #10
You're = You are RandiFan1290 Nov 2014 #78
There are far too many opinions masquerading as fact in the OP to warrant a substantive response. branford Nov 2014 #3
This kid wasn't unarmed, he had an airsoft handgun that looked remarkably realistic. GGJohn Nov 2014 #4
If those cops were seriously so scared shitless of a 12 year old 99th_Monkey Nov 2014 #18
Did you even look at the picture of the gun? GGJohn Nov 2014 #19
This is a freaking 12 year old we're talking about here. 99th_Monkey Nov 2014 #23
Oh I get it, GGJohn Nov 2014 #29
I do have a clear bias 99th_Monkey Nov 2014 #44
The gun looked real. The gun LOOKS real. Jenoch Nov 2014 #67
And the 12 y. o. boy LOOKED "dangerous" 99th_Monkey Nov 2014 #140
You might be correct. Jenoch Nov 2014 #155
Huh? branford Nov 2014 #20
Please see 99th_Monkey Nov 2014 #26
Are you actually suggesting a police officer can only fire on a suspect branford Nov 2014 #31
The slimy part is that you are correct but they won't admit it... Oktober Nov 2014 #39
Wait? You do not believe some dead cops is better than some dead, innocent children? ieoeja Nov 2014 #165
No it's not... Oktober Nov 2014 #172
Police officers need not --unreasonably-- risk their lives. branford Nov 2014 #179
When the "suspect" is 12 with a bb gun, THEN yes. Take cover, stay safe, talk, observe ... 99th_Monkey Nov 2014 #50
Interesting. Could you kindly provide your relevant expertise on tactics and police procedure, branford Nov 2014 #57
If it is just them treestar Nov 2014 #147
12 year olds have shot people treestar Nov 2014 #55
To say it's "not impossible" is VERY different 99th_Monkey Nov 2014 #66
They have to know it's a BB gun before they can be judged on treestar Nov 2014 #142
What an officer KNOWS or ASSUMES he/she knows 99th_Monkey Nov 2014 #156
If she'd done the same thing, I don't think they'd treestar Nov 2014 #176
what should they do if it's a seven-year-old with a weapon? zazen Nov 2014 #68
If the blonde girl is waving a gun around in a playground XemaSab Nov 2014 #85
That's all certainly possible and could be taken into account treestar Nov 2014 #143
This 12-yo wanted people to think he was dangerous XemaSab Nov 2014 #82
And he found cops stupid & incompetent enough to fall for it nt 99th_Monkey Nov 2014 #138
it was a fucking bb gun noiretextatique Nov 2014 #24
You know that after the fact. branford Nov 2014 #33
because...the 911 caller said it might be fake noiretextatique Nov 2014 #52
Might be fake also means might be real. branford Nov 2014 #59
And the cops didn't know that. GGJohn Nov 2014 #34
UH...DUH: I got that the FIRST time you posted the BB gun noiretextatique Nov 2014 #49
OK. GGJohn Nov 2014 #51
Alledgedly... BklnDem75 Nov 2014 #81
Well, you got the "don't care" part right. ManiacJoe Nov 2014 #188
What's your point? Oktober Nov 2014 #40
what is yours, to defend killer cops noiretextatique Nov 2014 #54
Is there a scenario in which you might conclude that the cop's actions were justified? Orrex Nov 2014 #107
there are some people for whom the police officer is always wrong treestar Nov 2014 #148
And no way to keep track of them, either Orrex Nov 2014 #158
Only real guns require background checks in Ohio. FarPoint Nov 2014 #79
Lots of assumptions are being made. Once the video is released, we will know more. uppityperson Nov 2014 #9
A reasonable voice. GGJohn Nov 2014 #11
you are not reasonable. noiretextatique Nov 2014 #25
And how many times does this have to be shown to you? GGJohn Nov 2014 #32
Post it as often as you want. cwydro Nov 2014 #77
Maybe this is a reason why the "haters" don't buy into it! atreides1 Nov 2014 #173
LOL, funny coming from you! nt Logical Nov 2014 #110
Eventually the only way P.O.s will be believed is if they take a bullet first... Rye Bread Pizza Nov 2014 #12
Maybe the shooters finger slipped and pulled the trigger... Oktober Nov 2014 #13
The police officer may also have been shot by an unknown sniper, branford Nov 2014 #22
I am too new to up vote but that was a good one. n/t Rye Bread Pizza Nov 2014 #141
you mean a BB, in this case noiretextatique Nov 2014 #27
Which the cops didn't know at the time of the confrontation. GGJohn Nov 2014 #36
but YOU know it now, so stop claiming he was armed noiretextatique Nov 2014 #38
He was armed, that's not a lie, GGJohn Nov 2014 #41
you are so full of it noiretextatique Nov 2014 #47
And you continue to post utter nonsense. GGJohn Nov 2014 #48
you are full of shit noiretextatique Nov 2014 #197
If someone pulled that "gun" on you and demanded your wallet XemaSab Nov 2014 #86
did he do that? noiretextatique Nov 2014 #199
xemasab asked a question I would like to see your answer you joeglow3 Nov 2014 #152
no answer noiretextatique Nov 2014 #198
I have had a gun pulled on me joeglow3 Nov 2014 #200
thank you...scared white american white man noiretextatique Nov 2014 #202
I sure as shit wouldn't wait to get shot before defending myself joeglow3 Nov 2014 #205
a fng bb gun...does it even matter to you that it is not real? noiretextatique Nov 2014 #206
When I had a gun pulled on me, the person claimed to have a bomb joeglow3 Nov 2014 #207
Sadly, so many folks are walking around with gunz nowadays, more and more of this will happen. Hoyt Nov 2014 #14
not if you are white eom noiretextatique Nov 2014 #203
Suicide by cop. ManiacJoe Nov 2014 #15
that's the cop's story eom noiretextatique Nov 2014 #28
Not according to any article I have seen. ManiacJoe Nov 2014 #30
the cop claimed he reached in his waist noiretextatique Nov 2014 #43
Enough with the "unarmed kid" bullshit. You know better. ManiacJoe Nov 2014 #62
he had a fng BB gun, you idiot noiretextatique Nov 2014 #204
Congrats, you are beginning to understand. ManiacJoe Nov 2014 #208
The Police are pushing very hard here, to make their case, for a full blown Police State 99th_Monkey Nov 2014 #16
food for thought Aerows Nov 2014 #17
as soon as we get rid of the last crew noiretextatique Nov 2014 #45
"it is almost a tacit implication of guilty if they remain silent for hours" Oktober Nov 2014 #35
Sounds like more king of hill crap. Eleanors38 Nov 2014 #65
It looks like a real gun. Quantess Nov 2014 #72
Yes, the police want you to think that, why would they HereSince1628 Nov 2014 #80
And yet you seem already to have declared him guilty. Orrex Nov 2014 #90
No, I think the police are guilty of a PR push that's inherently unfair HereSince1628 Nov 2014 #151
And if the police didn't immediately provide their story, show the gun in evidence, etc., branford Nov 2014 #159
The police need to treat a homicide investigation like...a homicide investigation HereSince1628 Nov 2014 #162
Is the famly under a gag order? Orrex Nov 2014 #167
The family really isn't in a position to examine and question evidence. HereSince1628 Nov 2014 #168
Has their attorney been denied access to the evidence? Orrex Nov 2014 #169
I object to the PD's presentation of the evidence to the media HereSince1628 Nov 2014 #170
You are welcome to voice that objection. Orrex Nov 2014 #171
And I will. Police statements are subject to conflict of interest and nothing HereSince1628 Nov 2014 #175
It's not as exculpatory as you seem to want it to be. Orrex Nov 2014 #178
How exculpatory it is, isn't the issue. The cops playing public opinion IS HereSince1628 Nov 2014 #180
You are welcome to your opinion. Orrex Nov 2014 #181
I expect them to not treat it as 'exceptional' HereSince1628 Nov 2014 #182
I am not interested in platitudes Orrex Nov 2014 #186
It looks like a real gun. Quantess Nov 2014 #101
That's not really the point...the point is the police are working the public attitude. HereSince1628 Nov 2014 #157
That is certainly possible. Quantess Nov 2014 #174
The police SHOULD BE SILENT. That is what a fair trial depends on HereSince1628 Nov 2014 #177
Police should be silent? Quantess Nov 2014 #189
Excuse me for wanting to be so old fashioned as to be non-prejudicial HereSince1628 Nov 2014 #192
Why are toy manufacturers allowed to sell those? stone space Nov 2014 #83
Because most owners use them responsibly. ManiacJoe Nov 2014 #187
like I asked upthread, what if this were a seven-year-old? or four-year-old? zazen Nov 2014 #87
Are you willing to be shot trying to talk to a minor reaching for what appears to be a real gun? Lurks Often Nov 2014 #92
so should I shoot a five-year-old reaching for what appears to be a real gun? zazen Nov 2014 #98
Do you equate "reaching for" with "pulled out of his waistband?" Orrex Nov 2014 #99
I have no idea--I'm using the last poster's words to clarify whether cops should shoot a small child zazen Nov 2014 #100
Then you're asking a question that's tangential to the issue at hand Orrex Nov 2014 #105
I asked a simple question, are you willing to be shot by a child Lurks Often Nov 2014 #102
how weird--getting attacked from all sides here when I don't even have a position zazen Nov 2014 #112
Still avoiding the answer Lurks Often Nov 2014 #115
Can you name a single law enforcement agency Jenoch Nov 2014 #126
And the use of that would have met the same condemnation treestar Nov 2014 #149
This is true treestar Nov 2014 #146
Guns are no easier to get now then in 1968 Lurks Often Nov 2014 #153
It was a 12 year old, not 16, not 20, not 8, not 4. Quantess Nov 2014 #190
This is a cop's nightmare. Vinca Nov 2014 #89
But the kid didn't point the gun at the cop Beaverhausen Nov 2014 #114
They never even say "Drop the gun" any more. Darb Nov 2014 #117
The story I read said the officers saw the gun on Jenoch Nov 2014 #129
Do you think the cop was just itchin' to shoot a 12 year old? MH1 Nov 2014 #137
Undeniable? Were you there? Beaverhausen Nov 2014 #150
are you fng kidding me? noiretextatique Nov 2014 #201
Actually, yes, I think he was itching to shoot him Nevernose Nov 2014 #214
Simply reaching - you're holding the cop to a standard that he has to be shot first? treestar Nov 2014 #145
Or not teaching them to put their hands up so the cop won't shoot them treestar Nov 2014 #144
Gun love, gun promotion, gun fever. We are shooting and killing ourselves and the NPR kelliekat44 Nov 2014 #116
It's self-perpetuating lunacy. Darb Nov 2014 #118
National Public Radio? Throd Nov 2014 #119
I hate those NPR gun toters. aikoaiko Nov 2014 #123
But I love the NPR gun totebags. Orrex Nov 2014 #124
Those totebags Duckhunter935 Nov 2014 #134
I though only NPR lifetime members could get the totebag? branford Nov 2014 #161
The truest thing we've heard today! Quantess Nov 2014 #193
video is now out! Garion_55 Nov 2014 #209
I'm noticing a lot of the 'wait and see' crew had no problem condemning this kid... BklnDem75 Nov 2014 #210
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Justice for Tamir Rice! 1...»Reply #49