Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Thanks, Mr. President. nt Ykcutnek Nov 2014 #1
Thanks. Obama. GeorgeGist Nov 2014 #2
This package needs to be vetoed Gothmog Nov 2014 #3
Thank you, Obama, and screw you Reid. nt geek tragedy Nov 2014 #4
Buh buh buh BumRushDaShow Nov 2014 #5
Yeah, Blame Obama First! But, where are they when he's vowed to VETO something like this? Cha Nov 2014 #6
MIA as usual BumRushDaShow Nov 2014 #7
Oh we got one down here who thinks the President is "doing the bare minimum".. Cha Nov 2014 #11
Glad he's doing the bare minimum. theaocp Nov 2014 #8
"The bare minimum".. shows you know nothing about it. Cha Nov 2014 #9
indeed, that's all it takes to keep the hope he changes type on board stupidicus Nov 2014 #14
So glad he is our President. AllyCat Nov 2014 #10
I don't understand the cheering before the touchdown. This is a promise. rhett o rick Nov 2014 #12
Thanks for the TeaLeftist rant. It's helping fall asleep. RBInMaine Nov 2014 #13
Your insults aside I want the same results as you. But I am reluctant to trust that rhett o rick Nov 2014 #15
Yes, the president fought hard for chained CPI cheapdate Nov 2014 #17
This is the new propaganda MO. We never get actual change for the better. woo me with science Nov 2014 #18
Sadly some have learned to settle for a promise. I guess they feel it's better than nothing. rhett o rick Nov 2014 #19
We've seriously reached a point of, "The chocolate ration has been increased." woo me with science Nov 2014 #20
Yay grahamhgreen Nov 2014 #16
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama Promises to Veto Pe...»Reply #16