Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Shocking mistake in Darren Wilson grand jury [View all]badtoworse
(5,957 posts)17. My recollection is a bit different than that
I don't recall him saying that he told the grand jurors to ignore any witnesses. He did describe the testimony and my sense was that he did so to explain why the GJ might have reached the conclusion it did. I believe he said that some witnesses maintained consistent testimony, some changed their testimony when the forensic evidence showed their testimony to be inaccurate and some later admitted they did not actually see what happened. He did say that the jurors heard testimony from everyone. I don't remember him describing any instructions given to the grand jury
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think his mindset was he wasn't worried for one second about getting in trouble.
NoJusticeNoPeace
Dec 2014
#41
That's what McCulloch kept saying during his 1/2 hour "explanation" of the verdict to not indict.
99th_Monkey
Dec 2014
#12
He was supposed to be looking for an indictment. Instead he was acting as a defense attorney. He als
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#29
DA used witness 10 as the main one to back up the story, yes "story" Wilson told
NoJusticeNoPeace
Dec 2014
#42
Who would cross examine in a GJ proceeding? The jurors are allowed to ask questions.
badtoworse
Dec 2014
#7
It's almost unheard-of to even allow an accused perp to appear on their own behalf before a GJ
99th_Monkey
Dec 2014
#10
If a prosecutor believes no crime has been committed or that he can't win in court,...
badtoworse
Dec 2014
#21
There is no defense present at a GJ. They are generally provided information only by the prosecutor
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#30
Wilson didn't really need to have a "counsel" present during his GJ testimony
99th_Monkey
Dec 2014
#37
My saying McCulloch 'instructed' jury to ignore evidence is my interpretation of his statement
99th_Monkey
Dec 2014
#27
What I have is my very opinionated interpretation of this portion of McCulloch's "explanation"
99th_Monkey
Dec 2014
#46