General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I don't think the number of clicks DU gets in a day is very important. What is important ... [View all]NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)... "frothing at the mouth" is irrelevant - and couldn't be farther from the truth.
I seem "gleeful at the prospect of DU somehow failing"? Again, your perception has no basis in fact.
I don't come here to "criticize" participants - I sometimes come here to reply to anti-Dem/anti-Obama posts. I believe I have a right to do so.
"What is your definition of a Democrat? It seems like you're accusing the majority of DU of not being one... "
That last statement is particularly ironic on a site whose participants are constantly defining what a "Democrat" is - and guess what? For a lot of posters here, a "Democrat" is anyone who agrees with them 100%.
How many Democrats on this site are regularly labelled as Third Wayers, Conservadems, DINOs, etc? How many Democrats on this site have been told they are not "real Dems" if they are centrists or moderates? One rather prolific poster here actually labeled anyone who doesn't post in threads on certain topics as being "not really Democrats".
What are you doing wrong in my eyes? It doesn't matter what I think. DU's numbers are dropping, and maybe a little introspection into why that is happening might be in order for those who want to keep the site viable.
DU's viability is not of great concern to me - but to those to whom it IS a concern, a civil conversation on the topic could go a long way in turning that trend around.
I'm not the one labeling others as being