Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
26. May or may not, depends on 20 CFR § 404.403 (d)
Sun Apr 22, 2012, 12:08 AM
Apr 2012

20 CFR § 404.403 (d) simply state that the numbers used in 20 CFR § 404.403 (c) is the base for the mandated increase in Social Security due to inflation. Thus I am listing 20 CFR § 404.403 (c) to show the MAXIMUM amount the survivor's benefit can be.

(c) Eligible for old-age insurance benefits or dies in 1979. If an insured individual becomes eligible for old-age insurance benefits or dies in 1979, the monthly maximum is as follows—

(1) 150 percent of the first $230 of the individual's primary insurance amount, plus

(2) 272 percent of the primary insurance amount over $230 but not over $332, plus

(3) 134 percent of the primary insurance amount over $332 but not over $433, plus

(4) 175 percent of the primary insurance amount over $433.


These are the maximum total outlays can be. In the Regulations it is possible to have several survivors who are entitled to benefits, but if the total exceeds what is permitted under 20 CFR § 404.403 (d), all will be reduced to keep the total below that max.

For a complete copy of the actual regulation see:
20 CFR Part 404, Subpart E, 20 CFR § 404.401 et seq.

http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr;sid=0ad68dbfda5cb91ad7fa4faeab224e61;rgn=div6;view=text;node=20%3A2.0.1.1.5.5;idno=20;cc=ecfr

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm already planning to work to 70.... Sancho Apr 2012 #1
Military costs way less than 20% of GDP - more like 5%. Yo_Mama Apr 2012 #29
I've always thought this was a bad scenario. xchrom Apr 2012 #2
I had planned to work past 70, RebelOne Apr 2012 #3
well, I'm sure that THIS round of voting for neoliberal hacks, Wall Streeters, and yuppies MisterP Apr 2012 #4
IF anyone will employ them. patrice Apr 2012 #5
I have two relatives in their mid 60's with no prospects of ever retiring tularetom Apr 2012 #6
That's certainly how John Boehner wants it. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2012 #7
You can keep right on working and get social security at 65 lunatica Apr 2012 #8
If you were married to him for more than ten years, you are entitled to a stipend based 1monster Apr 2012 #12
It is called the Widow's share" of his SS Survivor's benefit happyslug Apr 2012 #19
Actually, it's called a spouse's benefit. charlyvi Apr 2012 #20
NOT in the Actual Regulations, 20 CFR § 404.336, listed herein: happyslug Apr 2012 #21
UM....the woman's ex husband is not dead. charlyvi Apr 2012 #22
Survivor's benefit is one lump sum divided among ALL survivors. happyslug Apr 2012 #23
Do you mean that I can apply for spouse's benefits when I'm 65? lunatica Apr 2012 #32
So should I apply when I'm 65 or when he is? lunatica Apr 2012 #36
According to the regulations, apply at age 62 happyslug Apr 2012 #37
Thanks. I'll do that. lunatica Apr 2012 #38
I'm collecting Survivor's Benefits kskiska Apr 2012 #24
May or may not, depends on 20 CFR § 404.403 (d) happyslug Apr 2012 #26
Thank you for all the information lunatica Apr 2012 #34
Thanks for this info lunatica Apr 2012 #35
I was married to him for 15 years lunatica Apr 2012 #31
66 and that's going to 67 Yo_Mama Apr 2012 #30
Are you saying that it's best to wait until I'm 66 or 67? lunatica Apr 2012 #33
Once you pass your full retirement age, you can work without penalty Yo_Mama Apr 2012 #39
I did. I started collecting social security when I hit 65. RebelOne Apr 2012 #41
Not this guy secondvariety Apr 2012 #9
I don't think I could stand being retired. baldguy Apr 2012 #10
That's BS about baby boomers. I've already told my husband he can't 1monster Apr 2012 #11
I'll be working until I am dead Marrah_G Apr 2012 #13
Good luck getting hired after 55. nm rhett o rick Apr 2012 #14
It isnt how long you will "have" to work, it's how long will you be able to work. rhett o rick Apr 2012 #15
Most will be unable to find work beyond 50 ProfessionalLeftist Apr 2012 #16
Work 'til you drop. Literally. marmar Apr 2012 #17
Yup- I've always figured it's best to drop dead at work- then someone's there to deal with it NBachers Apr 2012 #18
Yeah, but will employers permit it? Ilsa Apr 2012 #25
That sucks pondwater sylvi Apr 2012 #27
I was planning to retire at 55 but thanks UpYourMedsNow Apr 2012 #28
I won't have to, but I will FreeJoe Apr 2012 #40
What is this "retirement" you speak of? Bake Apr 2012 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Retirement bottom line: M...»Reply #26