General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Would You Trust a Democrat Who Voted Republican During the Civil Rights and Nixon Era? [View all]Wella
(1,827 posts)Nixon would be considered a liberal by the Tea Party now. Back then--and I remember it well--you could be Republican and pro-choice, pro-civil rights, and even support the idea that the government should be out of the bedroom. Mainstream Republicans actually carried the Civil Rights legislation in 1964 while Southern Democrats rejected it.
The Republican party changed DRASTICALLY in the late 70s and 80s with the Reagan presidential run and the deliberate courting of the evangelical vote. I also personally trace the change in GOP abortion attitudes with inroads made by the Catholic Church after 1973--in seven years, "prolife" had been written into the party platform, something that would have not happened earlier, when Barbara Bush was connected with Planned Parenthood. In fact, during the late 80s, I remember going to a lot of marches where we held up signs saying, "Free Barbara Bush!" since we felt she was muzzled by the pro-life plank of the platform. If you remember, even Nancy Reagan was pro-choice, and said so during the 90s, once safely out of politics.
The free (free!) market Ayn Rand people hadn't made their dent in the GOP in the 60s or 70s either. It was Reagan (not Nixon or Ford) that brought radical deregulation and challenges to the unions.
So my answer is I could see voting for Elizabeth Warren even though she was a Republican during those years. It was a different world and being a Republican was different then. When being Republican meant being "conservative", she left the party. If Gloria Steinem is right, and women get more radical as they get older, then Warren's move in her 40s makes sense too.