MH17 was the, "Wrong plane," says Ukrainian fighter pilot after shootdown.

[NuclearDem]

111. This is why Robert Parry isn't a defense expert.

Finally, the New Straits Times and Parry both cite retired Lufthansa pilot Peter Haisenko, who has pointed to photographic evidence of MH17 wreckage suggesting that cockpit panels were raked with heavy machine gun fire from both the port and starboard sides. “Nobody before Haisenko had noticed that the projectiles had ripped through the panel from both its left side and its right side. This is what rules out any ground-fired missile,” Parry wrote.

That is exactly what is to be expected from a surface-to-air, radar guided, proximity fuse, blast fragmentation missile as fired by an SA-11, which detonates close by an aircraft and uses its shrapnel to cause rapid decompression and shred it apart, with the shrapnel damage in the cockpit area if it was leading the aircraft, and the exact opposite of what it is to be expected from an infrared homing air-to-air missile, which goes for a direct impact on the aircraft, specifically its engines, and blows it apart in the air.

What's even more ludicrous is suggesting that an Su-25 could even get into guns range with MH-17. The Su-25 couldn't even get into missile range, much less close enough to use its guns on it.

Complete bullshit.