Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: MH17 was the, "Wrong plane," says Ukrainian fighter pilot after shootdown. [View all]And how close has an Su-25 to be in order shoot a missile at an airliner?
The Wikipedia description also says about that particular missile:
"It can be targeted by a helmet-mounted sight (HMS) allowing pilots to designate targets by looking at them."
The German version of the Wiki description also mentions that the R-73 has a proximity fuze: "Kommt das Flugziel in den Ansprechradius des Näherungszünders, wird der Splittergefechtskopf gezündet."
So, if we take the Russian radar data as a basis for our speculation, such a missile might have been fired from the left (north) of the airliner, targeted at its cockpit and exploded as soon as its radar/laser proximity fuze was close enough.
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wympel_R-73
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
167 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
MH17 was the, "Wrong plane," says Ukrainian fighter pilot after shootdown. [View all]
another_liberal
Dec 2014
OP
It's all over the world press. Only the Corporate Media has stopped reporting on that
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#98
the rational view - Russia didn't ask for this & Putin has high approval in his country
WillYourVoteBCounted
Dec 2014
#163
The difference is.. RT is Putin's Propaganda Outlet and US Media is GOPropaganda. And, most of us
Cha
Dec 2014
#105
4 "investigating" Countries Agreed Not to Disclose Key Details in Downing of MH17
WillYourVoteBCounted
Dec 2014
#161
MH17 - 4 Countries Agreed Not to Disclose Key Details in Downing of Malaysian Airlines Flight 17
WillYourVoteBCounted
Dec 2014
#164
How many different explanations is this now? I lost count. Next thing we'll know Putin
Nuclear Unicorn
Dec 2014
#5
"Consciousness of guilt," I think the term is. "Muddying the waters," also comes to mind.
Nuclear Unicorn
Dec 2014
#7
Putin will need to wait until OJ is finished finding the real hackers for North Korea
Trekologer
Dec 2014
#15
A source that's been discredited more than Shrub needs an open minded approach?
hobbit709
Dec 2014
#19
"A witness, who chose to remain anonymous, told Komsomolskaya Pravda (KP) daily"
Nuclear Unicorn
Dec 2014
#3
There are also conservative "media reports" and "studies" that show climate change is a hoax.
pampango
Dec 2014
#17
My point? "That is the way the game is played..RT story is not a surprise." "Some people tell lies."
pampango
Dec 2014
#41
I'll leave all that to a team of unbiased, neutral international experts to explore . . .
another_liberal
Dec 2014
#102
They already did, and found it was brought down by a surface to air missile.
NuclearDem
Dec 2014
#104
Knowledge of how surface to air and air to air missiles work, and photographs of the wreckage.
NuclearDem
Dec 2014
#123
"Chances are the rebels locked onto MH-17 while trying to lock onto the Su-25 and fired."
Adsos Letter
Dec 2014
#145
Two, 100-kg missiles are enough to drop the max ceiling by quite a bit, actually
NickB79
Dec 2014
#91
...or the untrained rebels accidentally locked onto MH-17 instead of the Su-25
NuclearDem
Dec 2014
#130
Actually, Russia's attempt to make the shootdown look like an attempted assassination of Putin
NuclearDem
Dec 2014
#53
The "haranguing" is over the complete technical implausibility of the story.
NuclearDem
Dec 2014
#78