Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RebelOne

(30,947 posts)
41. I did. I started collecting social security when I hit 65.
Mon Apr 23, 2012, 01:05 PM
Apr 2012

And I was also collecting a full salary. I would still be working today if I hadn't been laid off in 2010. I did not even bother looking for another job because I knew no one would hire me at the age of 71. So, fortunately, I had some savings and a 401K, so I will be all right for a few more years.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm already planning to work to 70.... Sancho Apr 2012 #1
Military costs way less than 20% of GDP - more like 5%. Yo_Mama Apr 2012 #29
I've always thought this was a bad scenario. xchrom Apr 2012 #2
I had planned to work past 70, RebelOne Apr 2012 #3
well, I'm sure that THIS round of voting for neoliberal hacks, Wall Streeters, and yuppies MisterP Apr 2012 #4
IF anyone will employ them. patrice Apr 2012 #5
I have two relatives in their mid 60's with no prospects of ever retiring tularetom Apr 2012 #6
That's certainly how John Boehner wants it. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2012 #7
You can keep right on working and get social security at 65 lunatica Apr 2012 #8
If you were married to him for more than ten years, you are entitled to a stipend based 1monster Apr 2012 #12
It is called the Widow's share" of his SS Survivor's benefit happyslug Apr 2012 #19
Actually, it's called a spouse's benefit. charlyvi Apr 2012 #20
NOT in the Actual Regulations, 20 CFR § 404.336, listed herein: happyslug Apr 2012 #21
UM....the woman's ex husband is not dead. charlyvi Apr 2012 #22
Survivor's benefit is one lump sum divided among ALL survivors. happyslug Apr 2012 #23
Do you mean that I can apply for spouse's benefits when I'm 65? lunatica Apr 2012 #32
So should I apply when I'm 65 or when he is? lunatica Apr 2012 #36
According to the regulations, apply at age 62 happyslug Apr 2012 #37
Thanks. I'll do that. lunatica Apr 2012 #38
I'm collecting Survivor's Benefits kskiska Apr 2012 #24
May or may not, depends on 20 CFR § 404.403 (d) happyslug Apr 2012 #26
Thank you for all the information lunatica Apr 2012 #34
Thanks for this info lunatica Apr 2012 #35
I was married to him for 15 years lunatica Apr 2012 #31
66 and that's going to 67 Yo_Mama Apr 2012 #30
Are you saying that it's best to wait until I'm 66 or 67? lunatica Apr 2012 #33
Once you pass your full retirement age, you can work without penalty Yo_Mama Apr 2012 #39
I did. I started collecting social security when I hit 65. RebelOne Apr 2012 #41
Not this guy secondvariety Apr 2012 #9
I don't think I could stand being retired. baldguy Apr 2012 #10
That's BS about baby boomers. I've already told my husband he can't 1monster Apr 2012 #11
I'll be working until I am dead Marrah_G Apr 2012 #13
Good luck getting hired after 55. nm rhett o rick Apr 2012 #14
It isnt how long you will "have" to work, it's how long will you be able to work. rhett o rick Apr 2012 #15
Most will be unable to find work beyond 50 ProfessionalLeftist Apr 2012 #16
Work 'til you drop. Literally. marmar Apr 2012 #17
Yup- I've always figured it's best to drop dead at work- then someone's there to deal with it NBachers Apr 2012 #18
Yeah, but will employers permit it? Ilsa Apr 2012 #25
That sucks pondwater sylvi Apr 2012 #27
I was planning to retire at 55 but thanks UpYourMedsNow Apr 2012 #28
I won't have to, but I will FreeJoe Apr 2012 #40
What is this "retirement" you speak of? Bake Apr 2012 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Retirement bottom line: M...»Reply #41