Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: How infiltrated is the business world by family mf'ing values? [View all]Sopkoviak
(357 posts)66. Maybe the boss doesn't fully trust you.
In the banking and financial services industries "mandatory time off", usually 14 consecutive days, is considered a "best practises" management and accounting policy.
The theory being that if you are up to no good it should show up in that time frame without you there to "cover your tracks".
After I left banking in the '70's I continued the practise in my own businesses with my financial and IT people. I knew too many business people that were screwed by their "trusted" long time bookkeeper or that amazing computer wizard.
FDIC:Risk Management
Section 4.2 - Internal Routine and Controls
Vacation Policies
All banks should have a vacation policy, which provides that officers and employees be absent from their duties for an uninterrupted period of not less than two consecutive weeks. Such a policy is considered an important internal safeguard largely because perpetration of an embezzlement of any substantial size usually requires the constant presence of the embezzler in order to manipulate records, respond to inquiries from customers or other employees, and otherwise prevent detection. Examiners and bank management should recognize that the benefits of this policy may be substantially, if not totally, eroded if the duties performed by an absent individual are not assumed by someone else. Where the bank's policy does not conform to the two-week recommended absence period, examiners should encourage the board of directors to annually review and approve the policy actually followed and the exceptions allowed. In such cases it is important that adequate compensating controls be devised and strictly enforced. If after consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances it is determined that the vacation policies are deficient, the matter should be discussed with the chief executive officer and the board of directors. Comments and recommendations on the supplemental Internal Routine and Controls schedule may be appropriate.
Section 4.2 - Internal Routine and Controls
Vacation Policies
All banks should have a vacation policy, which provides that officers and employees be absent from their duties for an uninterrupted period of not less than two consecutive weeks. Such a policy is considered an important internal safeguard largely because perpetration of an embezzlement of any substantial size usually requires the constant presence of the embezzler in order to manipulate records, respond to inquiries from customers or other employees, and otherwise prevent detection. Examiners and bank management should recognize that the benefits of this policy may be substantially, if not totally, eroded if the duties performed by an absent individual are not assumed by someone else. Where the bank's policy does not conform to the two-week recommended absence period, examiners should encourage the board of directors to annually review and approve the policy actually followed and the exceptions allowed. In such cases it is important that adequate compensating controls be devised and strictly enforced. If after consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances it is determined that the vacation policies are deficient, the matter should be discussed with the chief executive officer and the board of directors. Comments and recommendations on the supplemental Internal Routine and Controls schedule may be appropriate.
https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/safety/manual/section4-2.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
86 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Texas law states no employee can be forced to utilize a benefit they did not personally negotiate.
RB TexLa
Dec 2014
#23
Ok, Melvin Beli. But I'm pretty sure your employer can make you stay home while getting...
Hassin Bin Sober
Dec 2014
#24
I think some people just like to feel superior to their co-workers
The Velveteen Ocelot
Dec 2014
#28
Any member of management who says this is providing proof of their incompetence
Major Nikon
Dec 2014
#37
Taking recreational time benefits you, your employer and your co-workers, having time with 'family'
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2014
#56
perhaps your employer believes the company would benefit from you taking time off
etherealtruth
Dec 2014
#60
I'm sure "not spending more time at the office" will be one of your life's greatest regrets
tenderfoot
Dec 2014
#78