Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Obama to Double Down on Fast Track Push Following SOTU"--Here We Go Again... [View all]KoKo
(84,711 posts)3. Thank You for this post. I heard Sir Goldmith give that interview when it happened....
It's well worth the watch these many years later.
What I can't understand is this from the article:
Part of the White House strategy is to suggest that Fast Track authority would in fact help progressive groups achieve their goals.
How the heck can "Fast Track for TPP" be "Progressive Goals?" Have they lost their minds or are they trying to reframe whata "Progressive" Goal is now that "Progressive Populists" are supporting Warren and Sanders and to combat the DLC/Third Way/NeoLib Agenda? Unbelievable!
Anyway Recommend your post ....hope people will give it a read and watch Goldsmith.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Obama to Double Down on Fast Track Push Following SOTU"--Here We Go Again... [View all]
KoKo
Jan 2015
OP
Thank You for this post. I heard Sir Goldmith give that interview when it happened....
KoKo
Jan 2015
#3
The TPP is so nasty that they will most likely pass it with bi-partisan support.
stillwaiting
Jan 2015
#13
What a great interview. He identified the major cause and effect of our current inequality crisis.
pa28
Jan 2015
#6
I have written my Senators twice on this issue. Both send me rhetoric crap in their responses.
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#5
Does the definition of "Trade Agreement" include all of the side issues they are
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#18
All we know is what Wikileaks has revealed because its still secret and "Fast Track"
KoKo
Jan 2015
#19
Revolting that it is constantly our job with a Democratic President. nt
woo me with science
Jan 2015
#42
I am not picking and choosing - I am saying the whole thing is a corporate coup.
djean111
Jan 2015
#31
"... "Fast Track" authority which means Senate does the vote without even seeing what's in the Trade
pampango
Jan 2015
#27
"Trade agreements can be written and negotiated to raise living standards for workers and to enforce
pampango
Jan 2015
#35
We don't. The negotiations are secret as most are. Republicans accused FDR of the same thing
pampango
Jan 2015
#41
Do you think that China's growth would have been limited without NAFTA? 90% of China's trade is not
pampango
Jan 2015
#45
The republican base does oppose the TPP and fast track. Their politicians don't care.
pampango
Jan 2015
#28
So much theater going on right now. It's bigger than a three-ring circus. nt
stillwaiting
Jan 2015
#12
Yep. Let's talk about bread bags and pretend the Republicans are our only problem.
woo me with science
Jan 2015
#22