Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
134. This interview explains the letter & how she studiously avoids endorsing Hillary~
Thu Jan 22, 2015, 12:12 AM
Jan 2015
STEPHANOPOULOS: You've been pretty clear, and we showed it in Jeff Zeleny's piece, that you say you're not running for president in 2016. It seems like you've just affirmed it again. You also signed a letter -- several senators signed a letter earlier this year encouraging Hillary Clinton to run.

So is she your candidate in 2016?

WARREN: You know, all of the women -- Democratic women, I should say, of the Senate urged Hillary Clinton to run. And I hope she does.

STEPHANOPOULOS: You hope she does. And if she does, she is your candidate, you're going to endorse her?

WARREN: If Hillary -- Hillary is terrific.

STEPHANOPOULOS: You know, you've said she is terrific very many times. You say that again in this book, "A Fighting Chance." But this book leaves out something of a pointed criticism from your earlier book, "The Two Income Trap."

There you praised first lady Hillary Clinton for her opposition to this bankruptcy bill pushed by the big banks, but go on to talk about how she, as New York senator, seemed she could not afford that principled position.

Senator Clinton received 140,000 in campaign contributions from banking industry executives in a single year. Big banks were now part of Senator Clinton's constituency. She wanted their support, and they wanted hers, including a vote in favor of that awful bill.

So do you think that -- are you worried that somehow she will bow to big business, those were your words in that book, if she becomes president?

WARREN: Look, I've made it clear all the way through this book and really what I've been working on for the last 25 years, that I'm worried a lot about power in the financial services industry.

And I'm worried about the fact that basically starting in the '80s, you know, the cops were taken off the beat in financial services, these guys were allowed to just paint a bull's eye on the backsides of American families.

They loaded up on risk. They crashed the economy. They got bailed out. And what bothers me now is they still strut around Washington. They block regulations that they don't want. They roll over agencies whenever they can. And they break...

STEPHANOPOULOS: Did they rollover Hillary Clinton?

WARREN: Well, that's -- they break the law, and still don't end up being held accountable for it, and going to jail.

One of the things that I focus on really hard throughout this book is that that is one of the prime examples of how the playing field is tilted and how we've got to push back against it.

It's a central issue for me. It's something I'm going to keep talking about. And I'm going to keep talking about it with everyone.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Right. But -- I understand. Do you think Hillary Clinton will push back on that as well?

WARREN: Well, I'm going to keep talking about this issue. And I'm going to keep pushing on this issue.

http://crooksandliars.com/2014/04/abcs-stephanopoulos-makes-elizabeth-warren
Lets be honest.....that is completely FALSE! VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #1
No, it's pretty dead-on! Roland99 Jan 2015 #18
Utter Cowpie! VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #24
HRC on TPP Roland99 Jan 2015 #25
Not nearly enough....lets check what the voting record says shall we? VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #26
On economic measures she is strongly in the negative (-5), another wall street cheerleader. arthritisR_US Jan 2015 #38
You are misreading it too.... VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #41
Call me ignorant, that's fair because I am trying to understand those arthritisR_US Jan 2015 #48
actions speak louder than words, especially campaign words. we know what she's done, and ND-Dem Jan 2015 #68
That's some rhetoric I consider to be bigoted bullshit. First off Hillary was highly opposed to Bluenorthwest Jan 2015 #88
She's more progressive than many other possible candidates, such as Joe Biden and Jim Webb. pnwmom Jan 2015 #55
Jim Webb I would definitely agree with, Joe Biden I can't. nt arthritisR_US Jan 2015 #67
that's like saying except for 9-11 Bush kept us safe AtomicKitten Jan 2015 #72
One question, if you think she's all that why would you support her if she is nominated? Autumn Jan 2015 #2
No...A Republican wouldn't nominate non-psychopaths to the Supreme Court. Ken Burch Jan 2015 #4
Let's be honest...I HRC was so bad....why will Bernie Sanders not only vote for her.... VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #3
Lesser-evilism. Ken Burch Jan 2015 #6
He does? REALLY NOW? VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #7
I guess there's nothing in the DU rules that prevents you from posting the identical thing a million tularetom Jan 2015 #29
Not when it is the TRUTHFUL record of a respected Democrat...no its not... VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #30
that's not her record. ND-Dem Jan 2015 #69
Yes it is....would you like me to show you? Because I most certainly can.... VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #105
I believe it's 'votematch's' categorization and evaluation of her record, ND-Dem Jan 2015 #106
You want the quotes? ....Good thanks! VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #110
thanks for the spam. and just as i thought, it's not her record. ND-Dem Jan 2015 #111
WTH is wrong with you ...that IS her record.... VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #112
it's how she was rated by organizations using their own classification system, their own selection ND-Dem Jan 2015 #114
No my friend...it is NOT....it is summarized....but IT IS her record...and there is plenty more VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #115
Here just on abortion alone... VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #113
Go for it. You picked her centerpiece issue for liberal credibility, one I'd argue she isn't amazing TheKentuckian Jan 2015 #146
there is PLENTY more of her record there....YOU guys cannot keep lying about her record.... VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #147
Bless you, Vanilla R Hekate Jan 2015 #117
You are welcome....I always did like a good fight! VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #118
just like there's nothing in DU rules that prevents posting the same BS about Hillary a million wyldwolf Jan 2015 #37
I looked again just to be sure tularetom Jan 2015 #44
though I was replying TO you, it wasn't ABOUT you wyldwolf Jan 2015 #46
Let's be honest. Collecting 'dittos' gives you an ego boost wyldwolf Jan 2015 #5
No, my ego doesn't enter into this at all. Ken Burch Jan 2015 #9
Historical revisionists and psychics like yourself don't 'bother me.' They AMUSE me. wyldwolf Jan 2015 #39
I'm no historical revisionist. I lived through the Nineties. Ken Burch Jan 2015 #71
you constantly revise history to fit your view. Reference our RFK discussion downthread. wyldwolf Jan 2015 #74
I refuted your claim about RFK in my response to it. Ken Burch Jan 2015 #97
No you didn't. As usual, and like now, you're posting a bunch of opinions. wyldwolf Jan 2015 #101
Vote for the candidate of your choice. Adrahil Jan 2015 #76
+1 LordGlenconner Jan 2015 #43
What a bunch of utter baloney. greatlaurel Jan 2015 #8
Lyndon Johnson was doomed to lose if renominated in 1968. Ken Burch Jan 2015 #10
How about if we give her a fully Democratic sweep ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #11
Not to the professional curmudgeons! VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #13
I'm for working for that anyway. Ken Burch Jan 2015 #16
The President doesn't write the legislation ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #22
she will likely be Obama 2. nt msongs Jan 2015 #12
and you have a problem with that? VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #15
successful for who? ND-Dem Jan 2015 #120
by anyone's standards....except for Republicans... VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #124
it took 10 years to get us out of the great depression. it's been 6 years since the great recession ND-Dem Jan 2015 #128
YOUR anecdotal evidence....is not proof of anything.... VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #129
*your* anecdotal evidence; the evidence of the upper middle political class; ND-Dem Jan 2015 #133
You don't dig out of a hole. The first rule of getting out of one is to stop digging. Digging makes TheKentuckian Jan 2015 #142
One can only hope. nt Bobbie Jo Jan 2015 #19
Ha! If Only. LawDeeDah Jan 2015 #40
That would be good. Change is incremental. n/t Adrahil Jan 2015 #77
Not always. On civil rights, for example, Ken Burch Jan 2015 #123
But's not like that legislation came out of the blue.... Adrahil Jan 2015 #143
Obviously it's a generational struggle. Ken Burch Jan 2015 #144
She's the ultimate Centrist Not as Bad candidate. A power hungry mediocrity. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2015 #14
NO she is NOT...How many times do I have to prove this to YOU? VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #17
Privatize social security? Free trade? ETC? Are you fucking kidding me? You're PROVING she's RW RiverLover Jan 2015 #27
What? Those aren't Leftie policies anymore? VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #28
Sorry, it does say that. Watching the SOTU... But I really am skeptical~ RiverLover Jan 2015 #32
Well I am giving you the public record of what she HAS done... VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #34
That is a good thing. Her husband's NAFTA and his gutting of wall street regulation arthritisR_US Jan 2015 #51
Meh, one never knows. People are not inanimate, unchanged objects. Circumstances are unpredictable. UTUSN Jan 2015 #20
1+n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #23
What method are you using to foretell the future? Agnosticsherbet Jan 2015 #21
Exactly. Such confidence is almost absurd. cheapdate Jan 2015 #35
Over simplification, and reduction to black and white thinking Agnosticsherbet Jan 2015 #54
RE: Your line on RFK. wyldwolf Jan 2015 #31
Bobby Kennedy wanted jobs programs for people on welfare-as did and DO those on welfare themselves Ken Burch Jan 2015 #63
And Bill Clinton baked a workforce development component into the '96 bill... wyldwolf Jan 2015 #73
Bull. Shit. Rosco T. Jan 2015 #33
I find it ironic that on the same day we have a thread lambasting Obama BainsBane Jan 2015 #36
+100! zappaman Jan 2015 #45
+ infinity. nt ecstatic Jan 2015 #50
Can you please link to the thread "lambasting Obama for not delivering on a single payer promise"? Scuba Jan 2015 #52
That would be your OP BainsBane Jan 2015 #57
I never mentioned Obama, except to point out that Dems controlled the White House ... Scuba Jan 2015 #58
I am afraid I have to correct you there BainsBane Jan 2015 #61
I wonder how often this "your own position has slipped a bit to where you are a bit closer to... bettyellen Jan 2015 #53
Oh, you mean us "Third Way" folk? BainsBane Jan 2015 #59
+ Infinity (nt) Recursion Jan 2015 #56
I have always known that capital called the tune in this country. Ken Burch Jan 2015 #64
Let's examine this BainsBane Jan 2015 #66
Well said. The role of the President in the American system is conservative (small "c") by design YoungDemCA Jan 2015 #83
+1 lumberjack_jeff Jan 2015 #108
Well-said, BB. The operative word is "fantasies." nt Hekate Jan 2015 #125
Sir, I know JEBtm JCMach1 Jan 2015 #42
Who is YOUR suggestion? Focus on that person instead of tearing down the current crop! ecstatic Jan 2015 #47
didn't see vote against both Alito and Roberts? Kind of amazing you did not address women's issues- bettyellen Jan 2015 #49
HRC isn't the only person who can fight the assault on choice. Ken Burch Jan 2015 #65
it is a huge issue that currently is killing many women, literally jailing them for pregnancy these bettyellen Jan 2015 #82
I didn't mention it in the OP(I guess I should have) because ANY Democrat will fight for choice. Ken Burch Jan 2015 #95
The reason she is the frontrunner is because the polls say she is the frontrunner. StevieM Jan 2015 #60
Then find somebody you find more appealling to vote for mythology Jan 2015 #62
let's be clear, you despise Hillary Skittles Jan 2015 #70
not despise just dislike dembotoz Jan 2015 #81
and we all know how much glamour counts in elections Skittles Jan 2015 #94
It's not personal. It's about what her record shows. Ken Burch Jan 2015 #98
uh huh Skittles Jan 2015 #99
Sure it's not Hekate Jan 2015 #127
I'd say the same thing about anyone else with the same record. And you know it. n/t. Ken Burch Jan 2015 #135
Let's be honest....nothing progressive can happen under a Republican president. BootinUp Jan 2015 #75
And I wasn't calling for one to be elected(I said I'd vote for her if nominated) Ken Burch Jan 2015 #100
If I didn't have a raging headache BootinUp Jan 2015 #104
Everything is relative BootinUp Jan 2015 #139
No. of course not. Ken Burch Jan 2015 #140
Another Hilary bashing post oberliner Jan 2015 #78
Or, as some people would describe it: Tuesday brooklynite Jan 2015 #79
What will this be like come primary time? oberliner Jan 2015 #80
K&R There is nothing more important than stopping Hillary woo me with science Jan 2015 #84
JSYK F4lconF16 Jan 2015 #89
On my computer, you have to load it twice. woo me with science Jan 2015 #93
Yes, yes it is. F4lconF16 Jan 2015 #116
But dahhhhling, I was just chatting with Hill at the salon LondonReign2 Jan 2015 #85
Lol. nt benz380 Jan 2015 #96
"nothing progressive can happen under HRC as president." NCTraveler Jan 2015 #86
Like you, if she's nominated I'll vote for her - but the GOP is likely to win. closeupready Jan 2015 #87
PUMA! redux jpak Jan 2015 #90
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Jan 2015 #91
or...cartoons OF cat pictures brooklynite Jan 2015 #92
Do you consider cosponsoring increase in minimum wage which was the last increase to $7.25 being Thinkingabout Jan 2015 #102
I think that's more "let's exaggerate wildly and unfairly" than "let's be honest". N.T. Donald Ian Rankin Jan 2015 #103
Feel free to point out any areas where I exaggerated. Ken Burch Jan 2015 #122
Sure it could. lumberjack_jeff Jan 2015 #107
+1 No more Third Way corporatists and warmongers. woo me with science Jan 2015 #109
Let's be honest: tell me again why both Bernie Sanders and Liz Warren said they'd support Hillary. Hekate Jan 2015 #119
Why does that matter? in January of 1967, Bobby Kennedy was saying he supported LBJ for re-election Ken Burch Jan 2015 #121
You're making me LOL with your "Why does that matter?" My-my-my. >smh< nt Hekate Jan 2015 #126
That is completely false. Liz signed a letter but refuses to publicly, verbally endorse HRC. RiverLover Jan 2015 #130
What sort of letter did Liz sign,& if it's supportive,how's that different from a verbal endorsment? Hekate Jan 2015 #132
This interview explains the letter & how she studiously avoids endorsing Hillary~ RiverLover Jan 2015 #134
the pessimism expressed here is palpable Proud Liberal Dem Jan 2015 #131
I agree totally that we need to fight for a more progressive Congress. Ken Burch Jan 2015 #136
Koch et al miss those days~ RiverLover Jan 2015 #137
Hillary would appoint whoever her Wall St masters told her to. Progressives be damned. nt benz380 Jan 2015 #141
Agreed. eom saltpoint Jan 2015 #138
kick nt benz380 Jan 2015 #145
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Let's be honest....nothin...»Reply #134