Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
2. the horrible thing, actually, is the government giving tax and other advantages to online
Tue Feb 3, 2015, 11:51 AM
Feb 2015

sellers (amazon, specifically) to allow them to drive others out of business.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What a HORRIBLE thing for these people to do to society...Take our money, profit off of us NoJusticeNoPeace Feb 2015 #1
the horrible thing, actually, is the government giving tax and other advantages to online ND-Dem Feb 2015 #2
I agree with that, but to blame wages? HORRIBLE message NoJusticeNoPeace Feb 2015 #3
Yes, it does, when you have tight profit margins and you're a very small independent. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #6
I think that's a fair statement. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Feb 2015 #60
Right catrose Feb 2015 #62
Agenda jollyreaper2112 Feb 2015 #83
Exactly. And it doesn't sound like they were doing all that great in the first place: arcane1 Feb 2015 #8
wow. the big capitalist paid himself $28K, $13 an hour. Less than the new SF minimum wage. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #16
The minimum wage is being transitioned in. $15 won't be in effect until 2018 suffragette Feb 2015 #51
So what? You don't see to understand the root problem, and it's not because he has a failed ND-Dem Feb 2015 #64
Businesses that can't compete don't make money. I don't doubt he can't compete hughee99 Feb 2015 #5
I don't see that they are blaming the workers. kiva Feb 2015 #7
Of course they are, the main reasons they cant compete is NOT paying someone an extra $3 an hour NoJusticeNoPeace Feb 2015 #10
They were just barely profitable paying their workers $11.05 an hour, which was about $2 ND-Dem Feb 2015 #18
tell it to this guy - tell him he is full of shit, be my guest NoJusticeNoPeace Feb 2015 #20
I already answered that. And the owner was already paying more than $11 an hour to 6 workers. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #25
How did you answer that? So YOU are the one who cares about unfair competition NoJusticeNoPeace Feb 2015 #29
he was paying $11.05 an hour, more than the $11 demanded on your poster, and only $1.95 ND-Dem Feb 2015 #35
you're talking to a brick wall. apparently this guy should run his store as a non profit dionysus Feb 2015 #80
agreed. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #94
does he have a facebook page? snooper2 Feb 2015 #31
Is that all you have to add to this discussion? NoJusticeNoPeace Feb 2015 #34
For this discussion yes, everyone else already posted the relevant information snooper2 Feb 2015 #39
I ignored nothing, I have discussed all the points as to this issue, me thinks you just have NoJusticeNoPeace Feb 2015 #41
nope, just responding to posts and eating a bagel LOL snooper2 Feb 2015 #45
Did you pay a bagel-slicing tax on that thing? benz380 Feb 2015 #53
That is now the dumbest thing I have read this year so far LOL snooper2 Feb 2015 #55
It sounds like the owner is saying he can't keep his business open without paying hughee99 Feb 2015 #63
yeah, i'm sure fdr would have supported amazon's monopoly position, supported by no taxes and ND-Dem Feb 2015 #68
I support raising the minimum wage. kiva Feb 2015 #43
You dont blame a living wage, it is that simple. The many reasons he is going out of NoJusticeNoPeace Feb 2015 #44
I reread the article. kiva Feb 2015 #50
And it is $15 an hour by 2018, not tomorrow NoJusticeNoPeace Feb 2015 #52
In May the minimum goes up over $1 per hour, kiva Feb 2015 #54
The headline should say "Huge corporation puts another small business out into the street" NoJusticeNoPeace Feb 2015 #56
What we have here is a philosophical difference. kiva Feb 2015 #58
Yeah but the problem of wage exists because we have allowed capitalists and oligarchs NoJusticeNoPeace Feb 2015 #59
Of course there is a cost to paying for labor, kiva Feb 2015 #61
Starting in May, he would have to pay each worker $1.20 more per hour Art_from_Ark Feb 2015 #85
In this case, there *is* a cost, and yes, the system is corrupt and backwards and unless you ND-Dem Feb 2015 #69
It doesn't hurt his competition at all though. Amazon doesn't have to pay $15 an hour and in fact ND-Dem Feb 2015 #65
The owner paid himself $28,000 last year - after their best year ever. hack89 Feb 2015 #14
You DONT claim the REASON is the wages when that is NOT the reason, it may be the final NoJusticeNoPeace Feb 2015 #30
There is the fact that he would still be in business if the minimum wage remained the same. hack89 Feb 2015 #37
I think you could make some exceptions for maybe $13 vs $15 in certain situations NoJusticeNoPeace Feb 2015 #40
and amazon doesn't have to employ *anyone* in san francisco, but can still take the biggest ND-Dem Feb 2015 #67
Yeah, he's making the big bucks at a storefront sci-fi bookstore and probably robbing the till too. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #89
That person has a "blame the management" script that they won't deviate from, which in this ND-Dem Feb 2015 #66
i wouldn't get too fired up using this book store as an example. mom and pop dionysus Feb 2015 #78
"struggling to compete with online book sales and a national shift to electronic readers" arcane1 Feb 2015 #4
Exactly, and not only do these employees lose their job but rightwing TERRORISTS NoJusticeNoPeace Feb 2015 #12
He is really blaming it on an inability to increase sales enough to cover increased costs. hack89 Feb 2015 #19
Agreed. This certainly doesn't set an example like the article seems to imply. arcane1 Feb 2015 #21
I think it was a given that an increased minimum wage would shut down some businesses hack89 Feb 2015 #27
Yep, and that the lost jobs weren't really all that great anyway n/t arcane1 Feb 2015 #28
I'm sure that's what the newly-fired are saying right this moment. nt Dreamer Tatum Feb 2015 #32
Yeah, probably not :( arcane1 Feb 2015 #48
I'd love to work in a bookstore, personally. But slave work at Amazon is now almost the only ND-Dem Feb 2015 #38
Same here! One with used books and a cat. arcane1 Feb 2015 #49
yes. i love bookstores with pets and comfy chairs. almost a vanishing culture. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #70
it's sad that in todays world, with everything available onlone, small book and dionysus Feb 2015 #81
Green Apple Books on Clement St. Has opened another store in The Sunset. displacedtexan Feb 2015 #88
Maybe you don't like sci-fi. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #100
if their profit margin was that slim, they would go out of business anyway. spanone Feb 2015 #9
Any increase in the minimum wage would drive some struggling stores out of business hack89 Feb 2015 #22
Bingo! nt ladjf Feb 2015 #33
Yes. Amazon doesn't have to hire *any* workers in SF, or pay taxes to the city. Yet it can ND-Dem Feb 2015 #71
No business that depends for existence on paying less than a living wage to its workers RiverLover Feb 2015 #11
THANK YOU NoJusticeNoPeace Feb 2015 #13
This. So much this. Iggo Feb 2015 #17
Except of course when you give special tax breaks to giant businesses so they can drive smaller ND-Dem Feb 2015 #24
This reminds me of the small DVD rental store in downtown Asheville closing RiverLover Feb 2015 #15
Rents on Valencia Street have gone through the roof. KamaAina Feb 2015 #23
Maybe he could have stayed in business if slavery was legal? hunter Feb 2015 #26
He's already paying above minimum and barely pays himself more than his workers. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #47
All they have to do is copy and paste earlier announcements from Blockbuster Video. lpbk2713 Feb 2015 #36
SURRENDER TO THE BORG ND-Dem Feb 2015 #72
This is an unfair and misleading headline... TreasonousBastard Feb 2015 #42
YEP. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #73
The only people who make money off books are those who move volume. Dreamer Tatum Feb 2015 #46
Everybody else does it for the love, and enough to live on. But that option is fast-disappearing. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #74
This is a crying shame. Borderlands is the best sci-fi bookstore in the whole country. Comrade Grumpy Feb 2015 #57
Not So Fast daredtowork Feb 2015 #75
Please back up your contention that he "cast minimum wage as bad for business". I don't ND-Dem Feb 2015 #87
and to po your bubble, the last line of that article, from the owner himself says... dionysus Feb 2015 #76
Op fail? i posted the first 3 paragraphs. benz380 Feb 2015 #91
Those employees should have the chance to form a co-op to keep the store going by themselves. Ken Burch Feb 2015 #77
If they're making just above minimum wage how could the 6 employees dionysus Feb 2015 #82
Borderlands is right down the street from me- I've always been glad that they're there. NBachers Feb 2015 #79
Since he's keeping the coffee shop, he could sell a smaller quantity of books there. benz380 Feb 2015 #84
he already specializes in sci-fi. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #86
Pay your workers a living wage or give up. 6000eliot Feb 2015 #90
Not that simple when monopoloists like amazon can shift labor cost to low-wage states or cities ND-Dem Feb 2015 #93
It doesn't matter what others are doing. 6000eliot Feb 2015 #96
LOL. Amazon doesn't have to pay ANY labor in San Francisco, or taxes either. And they ND-Dem Feb 2015 #99
And this excuses other businesses from paying a living wage how exactly? 6000eliot Feb 2015 #101
The biggest competitor doesn't have to pay a living wage though, or taxes, and you're fine with ND-Dem Feb 2015 #103
I don't care about Bezos. 6000eliot Feb 2015 #104
Bezos DOESN'T pay his workers a living wage; not only that, he works them until they drop from ND-Dem Feb 2015 #105
I'm still not sure how this excuses the bookstore in the OP from paying their workers 6000eliot Feb 2015 #106
The owner doesn't pay himself a living wage either. The reason is Amazon. Sorry you're having ND-Dem Feb 2015 #107
It doesn't matter what Amazon does or what he pays himself. 6000eliot Feb 2015 #109
He pays his employees. He pays them $11 an hour and pays himself $13. I guess he doesn't ND-Dem Feb 2015 #114
Notice the store owners aren't calling for a national Guaranteed Annual Income (which would KingCharlemagne Feb 2015 #92
If you read what the owner actually *said,* he didn't blame the workers. Do all you folks ND-Dem Feb 2015 #95
Sorry, I was keying off this sentence in the OP: KingCharlemagne Feb 2015 #98
"In 18 years of business, Borderlands has faced a number of challenges. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #102
Who buys paper books anymore? They make these e-readers where you can have all your books in the dilby Feb 2015 #97
People like Bezos are taking us back to the 19th century. As for your ereaders: ND-Dem Feb 2015 #108
If it was just for books, sure Blue_Adept Feb 2015 #112
My kindle fire has replaced books, my laptop and my tv. dilby Feb 2015 #113
it is only one particular business quaker bill Feb 2015 #110
Something seems off krawhitham Feb 2015 #111
"one would assume a bookstore owner would get an even better price." why would anyone think ND-Dem Feb 2015 #115
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Borderlands Books in SF a...»Reply #2