Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Borderlands Books in SF announces closure, cites minimum wage increase [View all]arcane1
(38,613 posts)8. Exactly. And it doesn't sound like they were doing all that great in the first place:
"Last year was Borderlands best year for business, with sales even allowing a small profit. Beatts was able to pay himself $28,000 and employ six people."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
115 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Borderlands Books in SF announces closure, cites minimum wage increase [View all]
benz380
Feb 2015
OP
What a HORRIBLE thing for these people to do to society...Take our money, profit off of us
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#1
the horrible thing, actually, is the government giving tax and other advantages to online
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#2
Yes, it does, when you have tight profit margins and you're a very small independent.
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#6
Exactly. And it doesn't sound like they were doing all that great in the first place:
arcane1
Feb 2015
#8
wow. the big capitalist paid himself $28K, $13 an hour. Less than the new SF minimum wage.
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#16
The minimum wage is being transitioned in. $15 won't be in effect until 2018
suffragette
Feb 2015
#51
So what? You don't see to understand the root problem, and it's not because he has a failed
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#64
Of course they are, the main reasons they cant compete is NOT paying someone an extra $3 an hour
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#10
They were just barely profitable paying their workers $11.05 an hour, which was about $2
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#18
I already answered that. And the owner was already paying more than $11 an hour to 6 workers.
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#25
How did you answer that? So YOU are the one who cares about unfair competition
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#29
he was paying $11.05 an hour, more than the $11 demanded on your poster, and only $1.95
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#35
you're talking to a brick wall. apparently this guy should run his store as a non profit
dionysus
Feb 2015
#80
For this discussion yes, everyone else already posted the relevant information
snooper2
Feb 2015
#39
I ignored nothing, I have discussed all the points as to this issue, me thinks you just have
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#41
It sounds like the owner is saying he can't keep his business open without paying
hughee99
Feb 2015
#63
yeah, i'm sure fdr would have supported amazon's monopoly position, supported by no taxes and
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#68
You dont blame a living wage, it is that simple. The many reasons he is going out of
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#44
The headline should say "Huge corporation puts another small business out into the street"
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#56
Yeah but the problem of wage exists because we have allowed capitalists and oligarchs
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#59
In this case, there *is* a cost, and yes, the system is corrupt and backwards and unless you
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#69
It doesn't hurt his competition at all though. Amazon doesn't have to pay $15 an hour and in fact
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#65
You DONT claim the REASON is the wages when that is NOT the reason, it may be the final
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#30
There is the fact that he would still be in business if the minimum wage remained the same.
hack89
Feb 2015
#37
I think you could make some exceptions for maybe $13 vs $15 in certain situations
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#40
and amazon doesn't have to employ *anyone* in san francisco, but can still take the biggest
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#67
Yeah, he's making the big bucks at a storefront sci-fi bookstore and probably robbing the till too.
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#89
That person has a "blame the management" script that they won't deviate from, which in this
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#66
"struggling to compete with online book sales and a national shift to electronic readers"
arcane1
Feb 2015
#4
Exactly, and not only do these employees lose their job but rightwing TERRORISTS
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#12
He is really blaming it on an inability to increase sales enough to cover increased costs.
hack89
Feb 2015
#19
I think it was a given that an increased minimum wage would shut down some businesses
hack89
Feb 2015
#27
I'd love to work in a bookstore, personally. But slave work at Amazon is now almost the only
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#38
it's sad that in todays world, with everything available onlone, small book and
dionysus
Feb 2015
#81
Green Apple Books on Clement St. Has opened another store in The Sunset.
displacedtexan
Feb 2015
#88
Any increase in the minimum wage would drive some struggling stores out of business
hack89
Feb 2015
#22
Yes. Amazon doesn't have to hire *any* workers in SF, or pay taxes to the city. Yet it can
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#71
No business that depends for existence on paying less than a living wage to its workers
RiverLover
Feb 2015
#11
Except of course when you give special tax breaks to giant businesses so they can drive smaller
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#24
He's already paying above minimum and barely pays himself more than his workers.
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#47
All they have to do is copy and paste earlier announcements from Blockbuster Video.
lpbk2713
Feb 2015
#36
Everybody else does it for the love, and enough to live on. But that option is fast-disappearing.
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#74
This is a crying shame. Borderlands is the best sci-fi bookstore in the whole country.
Comrade Grumpy
Feb 2015
#57
Please back up your contention that he "cast minimum wage as bad for business". I don't
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#87
and to po your bubble, the last line of that article, from the owner himself says...
dionysus
Feb 2015
#76
Those employees should have the chance to form a co-op to keep the store going by themselves.
Ken Burch
Feb 2015
#77
Borderlands is right down the street from me- I've always been glad that they're there.
NBachers
Feb 2015
#79
Since he's keeping the coffee shop, he could sell a smaller quantity of books there.
benz380
Feb 2015
#84
Not that simple when monopoloists like amazon can shift labor cost to low-wage states or cities
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#93
LOL. Amazon doesn't have to pay ANY labor in San Francisco, or taxes either. And they
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#99
The biggest competitor doesn't have to pay a living wage though, or taxes, and you're fine with
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#103
Bezos DOESN'T pay his workers a living wage; not only that, he works them until they drop from
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#105
I'm still not sure how this excuses the bookstore in the OP from paying their workers
6000eliot
Feb 2015
#106
The owner doesn't pay himself a living wage either. The reason is Amazon. Sorry you're having
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#107
He pays his employees. He pays them $11 an hour and pays himself $13. I guess he doesn't
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#114
Notice the store owners aren't calling for a national Guaranteed Annual Income (which would
KingCharlemagne
Feb 2015
#92
If you read what the owner actually *said,* he didn't blame the workers. Do all you folks
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#95
Who buys paper books anymore? They make these e-readers where you can have all your books in the
dilby
Feb 2015
#97
People like Bezos are taking us back to the 19th century. As for your ereaders:
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#108