General Discussion

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)

48. And more links to NVIC.

Sun Mar 1, 2015, 05:52 PM

Mar 2015

Last edited Mon Mar 2, 2015, 04:52 PM - Edit history (1)

It's time to realize that you're con isn't working on anyone. Promoting disease through lies and deceit is not something people find to be an act they appreciate, after all. Who woulduvthunkit?

BTW, why did you lie and pretend you're not familiar with NVIC? You do realize how ridiculous that statement is, right?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

72 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Defying Science And Common Sense, New York Bill Would Ban GMOs In Vaccines [View all] HuckleB Feb 2015 OP

Woops! Chemisse Feb 2015 #1

Dumbasses. NuclearDem Feb 2015 #2

Omigod. zappaman Feb 2015 #3

How fucking stupid can some people be? What's next? Banning GMO created insulin? Liberal Veteran Feb 2015 #4

Alas, I would not be shocked to see that. HuckleB Feb 2015 #5

Ask your naturopath if Jimmy Dean Brand All-Natural Insulin is right for you. Liberal Veteran Feb 2015 #7

100% of ani-vaxxers i know are anti gmo. dilby Feb 2015 #6

I'm genuinely curious: Do you know what party these people belong to? n/t Buzz Clik Feb 2015 #33

However, a killed vaccine, or attenuated vaccine, is not the same as a genetically engineered vaccine. pnwmom Feb 2015 #8

You're looking at one part of the definition. HuckleB Feb 2015 #9

I'm looking at the definition the NIH uses. But I see what you're saying. pnwmom Feb 2015 #10

That's not really the point. HuckleB Feb 2015 #11

I think the biggest danger of GMO foods is that they allow farmers to heavily rely on herbicides pnwmom Feb 2015 #12

You keep repeating that unproven claim. HuckleB Feb 2015 #13

It is proven by the USDA's own figures. Apparently you don't trust the USDA, pnwmom Feb 2015 #15

You really think it's ok to push Benbrook? HuckleB Feb 2015 #16

If you don't like Dr. Benbrook, then rely on the USDA's numbers, pnwmom Feb 2015 #17

You just reposted the same article you posted above re: Benbrook's interpretation of the numbers. HuckleB Feb 2015 #18

Every scientist who's in Monsanto's pocket agrees. But many others don't. And it's just common sense pnwmom Feb 2015 #19

Oh, brother. No, many others do not. HuckleB Feb 2015 #20

Why do they make herbicide resistant crops? So they can use MORE HERBICIDES and the crops pnwmom Feb 2015 #21

You refuse to acknowledge the science, choosing to repeat unsupported anti-GMO cliches. HuckleB Feb 2015 #22

You refuse to acknowledge that herbicide-resistant GMO crops were developed precisely in order to allow pnwmom Feb 2015 #23

In other words, you are repeating your failure to acknowledge the science of the matter. HuckleB Feb 2015 #24

We don't know that today's herbicides are safer, because all the ingredients are not public pnwmom Feb 2015 #26

We both know that is simply conspiracy theory hyperbole. HuckleB Feb 2015 #29

You seem to be rather taken by Benbrook. HuckleB Feb 2015 #25

Unlike many of his detractors, Dr. Benbrook is not a shill for the pesticide producers. pnwmom Feb 2015 #27

Your emotion-based response and baseless, ugly attack against scientists and farmers is noted. HuckleB Feb 2015 #28

I'm not attacking scientists or farmers as a group. Just Monsanto and other shills. n/t pnwmom Feb 2015 #30

I beg to differ. HuckleB Feb 2015 #32

What is really basic stuff is what you won't admit: pnwmom Feb 2015 #35

You do realize that really poor article from 6 years ago was debunked in the links I've posted. HuckleB Feb 2015 #38

There is a continuing argument among groups of scientists -- Dr. Benbrook's work pnwmom Feb 2015 #39

You keep telling yourself that. HuckleB Feb 2015 #40

Mr. HuckleB is apparently the judge of who is "anti-science." immoderate Feb 2015 #36

Because scientists are a monolithic block, of course. pnwmom Feb 2015 #41

... Major Nikon Mar 2015 #49

As I said, scientists disagree. You are pointing to someone from "PG Economics" who disagrees. pnwmom Mar 2015 #50

Actually I'm pointing to the very link you provided Major Nikon Mar 2015 #52

I realize that. But all it proves is that there isn't a consensus of opinion, which was what pnwmom Mar 2015 #56

Actually it suggests the only outlier you seem to be able to provide is pretty much full of shit Major Nikon Mar 2015 #57

No, there are respected researchers in France and other countries who support Benbrook's work. n/t pnwmom Mar 2015 #59

Which still means you have provided exactly one outlier Major Nikon Mar 2015 #60

No, those scientists are doing their own research. There are multiple "outliers." n/t pnwmom Mar 2015 #62

But you failed to mention any of it Major Nikon Mar 2015 #63

Not true. HuckleB Mar 2015 #64

There is a BIG TIME consensus on the matter. HuckleB Mar 2015 #65

No, there are not. HuckleB Mar 2015 #54

Yes, if you had read the links I provided, all of that would have been explained much better. HuckleB Mar 2015 #53

I'm aware of that Major Nikon Mar 2015 #58

Got it. HuckleB Mar 2015 #66

The bill seems to allow those techniques bananas Feb 2015 #42

k&r uppityperson Feb 2015 #14

Because it didn't say in the excerpt in the OP, I checked: he's a Dem Buzz Clik Feb 2015 #31

Anti-GMO silliness isn't far from anti-vaccine silliness in its bipartisan nature. HuckleB Feb 2015 #34

Hm... if that's a Guinness, all I have to say is Buzz Clik Feb 2015 #37

A little Kilbeggan to boot! HuckleB Feb 2015 #44

There can be no modern vaccines without genetic modification. longship Feb 2015 #43

Just came across this link on twitter on past problems w RotaTeq (genetically engineered vaccine). proverbialwisdom Mar 2015 #45

And you're posting more anti-vaccine BS. HuckleB Mar 2015 #46

Post removed Post removed Mar 2015 #47

And more links to NVIC. HuckleB Mar 2015 #48

Par for the course. When his bullshit is challenged, he simply throws more bullshit against the wall Major Nikon Mar 2015 #61

fyi progressoid Mar 2015 #67

This makes me a bit sad Major Nikon Mar 2015 #69

Pure gold. Nice work. HuckleB Mar 2015 #68

I've read up on him and he doesn't seem to be that clueless Warpy Mar 2015 #51

Of course, it has no chance of passing. HuckleB Mar 2015 #55

We Need More Honesty in GMO Debates HuckleB Mar 2015 #70

Trashing yet ANOTHER thread! Thanks!! closeupready Mar 2015 #71

Thanks for letting everyone know! HuckleB Mar 2015 #72