Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
53. As a candidate, it is irrelevant.
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 08:24 PM
Mar 2015

In the same sense that it is irrelevant if a candidate has an affair. Personal matters of that kind don't matter much wrt their role as an elected leader.

Why not? They sold themselves as a package deal. AtomicKitten Mar 2015 #1
So Hilary can claim the success of the Clinton Presidency is hers? nt msanthrope Mar 2015 #12
she already has and does AtomicKitten Mar 2015 #18
Well....then I look forward to her third term. nt msanthrope Mar 2015 #20
she is inevitabler than ever AtomicKitten Mar 2015 #25
Well, if Gore had done so, we wouldn't have had to deal with Bush at all... Scootaloo Mar 2015 #58
So every job created under the Clinton presidency also counts in her favor then? nt geek tragedy Mar 2015 #19
Gee, I didn't know that she was Bill's mother. Beacool Mar 2015 #23
So according to your logic you give her credit for his successes, right? hrmjustin Mar 2015 #34
Something is wrong with this board, I see your question but no answers...what happened? NoJusticeNoPeace Mar 2015 #60
. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #64
I answered it for the 1st responder to my post AtomicKitten Mar 2015 #72
Can I download it onto my phone? LOL no thanks, I can bet what your answer is NoJusticeNoPeace Mar 2015 #75
or you could like read it AtomicKitten Mar 2015 #76
Actually you didn't answer my question. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #82
That works for me. NaturalHigh Mar 2015 #115
Me too! hrmjustin Mar 2015 #116
you didn't vote in the poll. Why not go on the record? wyldwolf Mar 2015 #80
It's a badly worded poll. AtomicKitten Mar 2015 #84
Yet you're arguing a position. wyldwolf Mar 2015 #85
said conservatives uponit7771 Mar 2015 #98
Bullshit. As the OP stated there are legitimate criticisms, but this is just a straw man and only still_one Mar 2015 #105
Yes bigwillq Mar 2015 #2
I thought it was yellow. (nt) stone space Mar 2015 #3
The dress? No. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #4
certainly some think it's relevant. The question is whether people at DU think geek tragedy Mar 2015 #6
I don't think it's going to change a single vote that wasn't already decided years ago. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #13
Yeah, like what, choosing to remain married? Beacool Mar 2015 #22
It's great that you think so. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #28
We live in a puritanical country where hypocrisy reigns. Beacool Mar 2015 #39
Bingo Hekate Mar 2015 #44
While I mostly agree with that, Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #46
Let's talk about Bibi's blowjob instead Still Sensible Mar 2015 #5
now there's a real scandal nt geek tragedy Mar 2015 #7
. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #11
LOL NoJusticeNoPeace Mar 2015 #65
that's not right!! uponit7771 Mar 2015 #99
No Hillary is her own person and not responsible for his sins. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #8
I find the issue utterly sexist. Beacool Mar 2015 #9
Agreed! hrmjustin Mar 2015 #15
That's my take, DU jury disagreed nt geek tragedy Mar 2015 #17
+1 DawgHouse Mar 2015 #26
The definition of sexist. NoJusticeNoPeace Mar 2015 #66
Geek, this board is a place for some people to exhaust their negative energy. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #10
. geek tragedy Mar 2015 #16
I'll take Bill's 9 BJ's (yes, Starr took note of the total number) Beacool Mar 2015 #30
Bush fucked the entire country plus a good chunk of the planet nt geek tragedy Mar 2015 #35
This In_The_Wind Mar 2015 #14
The bj certainly is irrelevant. If it's in response to another poster bringing Monica Autumn Mar 2015 #21
Discussion of a twenty year old blowjob is a "reasonable discussion?" nt msanthrope Mar 2015 #42
If a poster responds to a post where it is referred to yes it is. n/t Autumn Mar 2015 #45
Can you cite where that blowjob was referred to? nt msanthrope Mar 2015 #47
I'm not a lawyer and I didn't stay at a Holiday Inn last night so I'm not interested in citing Autumn Mar 2015 #49
So you are suggesting a hypothetical, then? As to when it would be appropriate msanthrope Mar 2015 #50
The OP stated it was brought up by another poster on DU so I guess it's someones hypothetical. n/t Autumn Mar 2015 #52
Absolutely and completely irrelevant. nt hifiguy Mar 2015 #24
It is relevant in that anyone who would bring it up, in this context, is telling us much about who NoJusticeNoPeace Mar 2015 #68
I voted NO since you didn't have Cha Mar 2015 #27
The only people it was relevant to back then were the psycho repukes William769 Mar 2015 #29
No the dress was never relevant. TexasProgresive Mar 2015 #31
Only that she continued to stay married to a man glasshouses Mar 2015 #32
I believe there was a Jewish carpenter who said... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #36
Still doesn't change the fact what I wrote is true glasshouses Mar 2015 #37
We all are fallen./NT DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #38
But we sinners can still hurl dead cats, then, right? nt Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #48
Are you suggesting that glsshouses stayed married to Bill Clinton for political reasons? Scootaloo Mar 2015 #62
I was taught it's generally bad form to peer into other people's relationships DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #67
Wow! hrmjustin Mar 2015 #40
Tell me if this had been a GOP President and his wife glasshouses Mar 2015 #69
First off you should not presumd to speak for me. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #74
Nope, I wouldn't have given an iota if Bush had cheated on Laura. Beacool Mar 2015 #93
My post wasn't about Bill Clinton or his accomplishments as POTUS glasshouses Mar 2015 #95
Your username is ironic. nt msanthrope Mar 2015 #43
In our society women often stay with men they dont want to stay with because to not do so NoJusticeNoPeace Mar 2015 #71
First of all Bobbie Jo Mar 2015 #89
Bullshit. Beacool Mar 2015 #91
I've always felt their marriage became one of political convenience LittleBlue Mar 2015 #113
It's irrelevant until Bill injects himself into the campaign tularetom Mar 2015 #33
He campaigned for Kerry, Obama, and numerous other Democrats... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #41
It doesn't matter to me that Clinton lied about a BJ tularetom Mar 2015 #79
If the Republicans want to make the election a referendum on the Clinton presidency... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #83
Huh? Her dress was green and gold! KamaAina Mar 2015 #51
Well played. nt msanthrope Mar 2015 #54
As a candidate, it is irrelevant. Bonobo Mar 2015 #53
In a world libodem Mar 2015 #55
The right hates Hillary. The fringe left hates Hillary... SidDithers Mar 2015 #56
Ah, again with the left-baiting Scootaloo Mar 2015 #59
I'm not Sid (or Skinner) but the left tends to cleave geek tragedy Mar 2015 #70
The left cares about her Iraq war vote, Goldman Sachs money, TPP, & Keystone. The RW cares not think Mar 2015 #101
Uhhhhh... Let me think... NOPE! nt longship Mar 2015 #57
good god. eom uppityperson Mar 2015 #61
It's relevant in that the GOP wasted 77 million on a partisan attack. tenderfoot Mar 2015 #63
No. Fuck no. Never. Why? The stupid burns us!!!! Rex Mar 2015 #73
The part of the country that cares about this is the biggest consumer of porn. If that isn't ironic stevenleser Mar 2015 #77
If it doesn't fit mikehiggins Mar 2015 #78
Holding Hillary Clinton responsible for her husbands acts is Sexist. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #81
Close but no cigar Blue Owl Mar 2015 #86
A vote for Hillary is a vote for Bill to become First Gentleman Dems to Win Mar 2015 #87
Someone once said "Part of the campaign=fair game for Lady Stepford." hughee99 Mar 2015 #88
excellent use of the google. geek tragedy Mar 2015 #90
I guess that depends on who you ask. hughee99 Mar 2015 #92
probably neither is, though some degree of partisanship will change perceptions. geek tragedy Mar 2015 #94
I completely understand the feeling. hughee99 Mar 2015 #97
The next couple of years are going to rip away the veil from the undercurrents of misogyny in this country Starry Messenger Mar 2015 #96
I do not support Hillary, I don't think it's relevant, it's going to be trotted out repeatedly. PeteSelman Mar 2015 #100
The anti Hillary folks and the concern trolls really do seem desperate to find something... brooklynite Mar 2015 #102
isnt that the truth still_one Mar 2015 #107
That dress was white! Generic Brad Mar 2015 #103
Monica Lewinsky's blue dress isn't relevant when... Kalidurga Mar 2015 #104
If Mrs. Clinton sold herself as a street-walker for the next 10 years, she'd still... BlueJazz Mar 2015 #106
1000% NO! Stupid question! nt Logical Mar 2015 #108
It Is Not Relevant To Me Liberal_Dog Mar 2015 #109
Only if Clinton is wearing it Tom Ripley Mar 2015 #110
missing poll option DBoon Mar 2015 #111
Jesus, I'm no Hillary fan Aerows Mar 2015 #112
Of course not. Why would it be? NaturalHigh Mar 2015 #114
No, unless you want to talk about Hillary's great restraint. Vinca Mar 2015 #117
Was it a BLUE dress or really a GOLD dress? B Calm Mar 2015 #118
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is Monica Lewinsky's blue...»Reply #53