Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wyldwolf

(43,891 posts)
23. Actually the pattern is this...
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 01:22 PM
Mar 2015

People create trumped up "scandals" then whine about them incessantly. Even when MILLIONS are spent to investigate and prosecute them, the most we get is a blow job. But because people are tired of the incessant whining from the right (and the left) they give in like they do to crying babies. ANYTHING to shut the babies up. But after a little while they realize giving in to the whiners only empowers them.

The Clinton years were different, not because Republicans despised that Democratic president any less, but because of what they thought his particular sins were. They knew in their hearts that Bill Clinton was venal and duplicitous, and if you scratched any surface you'd find the corruption lurking within. But they didn't think he was betraying America, just that he was doing everything from running drugs to having his political enemies killed. There was no matter too trivial or ridiculous for them to investigate; it may have reached the height of absurdity when the Republican Congress heard 140 hours of testimony on whether the Clintons had misused the White House Christmas card list. And when he made for himself an actual sex scandal, all the resentments of the 1960s culture wars came gushing out, and at the end of it they were disgusted with a public that didn't share their moral condemnation.

By the time Clinton's administration was over, he did something that incensed Republicans more than all his previous sins put together: he got away with all of it, and in style. Impeachment failed, and the last Gallup poll of his term pegged his approval at a stunning 66 percent.

Barack Obama won't ever again get approval ratings that high, because of how polarization has intensified since then. But his term may well wind down without any of the mini or fake scandals of his presidency taking much of a toll. Should that happen, Republicans will insist that if they only had more time, and if only the media had paid more attention, and if only the public had its head screwed on right, then everything would have been different. But by then they'll be focused on Hillary Clinton, convinced that any day now they'll discover the scandal that will bring her down.


http://theweek.com/articles/542494/what-hillary-clintons-emails-tell-about-scandal-age-obama

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It has been disheartening on DU the past week. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #1
Curious as to what you think she did that was "wonderful" as SoS. TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #2
Here are a few: BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #7
First two paragraphs: fuzzy and unprovable. TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #8
I do give her credit for emphasizing the importance of Asia to our interests. TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #10
She's not perfect, and we can go back and forth on the pros and cons, but you asked BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #12
The double-edged sword with her is, people who admire her do so because of who TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #15
" If her image of Towering Clinton Might and Inevitability starts to crumble, what's left?" BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #19
I appreciate and understand your pragmatism. TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #20
your comment could have been made about President Obama guillaumeb Mar 2015 #33
The Clintons have been in the public eye long enough for me to reasonably TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #41
there is a big difference between would and could guillaumeb Mar 2015 #43
Jeb Bush is another Hillary Clinton. Not a very distinguished governor TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #44
while I agree with a C+ or B-, in comparison to a kinda sleezy ChairmanAgnostic Mar 2015 #30
I guess "wonderful" was a bit of exaggeration and I don't recall her having any lasting monmouth4 Mar 2015 #9
she was implementing the poliocy of her boss, obama. she is not the one to criticize for policy nt msongs Mar 2015 #17
I think that in the general most people will vote for Clinton in the general election. el_bryanto Mar 2015 #3
Don't like her much and didn't think she did anything significant as Sen or SecState….BUT... blm Mar 2015 #4
While she is no where near as progressive as I would like, she is still a damn sight better OregonBlue Mar 2015 #5
I'm not surprised conservatives have a problem with powerful women meow2u3 Mar 2015 #6
The "opposing Hillary's policies is sexism" talking point is worn out. Maedhros Mar 2015 #18
maybe YOU'RE who the one who needs new talking points Skittles Mar 2015 #24
I don't like being called sexist, especially when it's not true. Maedhros Mar 2015 #25
try valid criticisms of Hillary instead of hysterical assertions Skittles Mar 2015 #27
What "hysterical assertions" have I made? Maedhros Mar 2015 #31
the topic is HILLARY HYSTERIA Skittles Mar 2015 #34
What "Hillary hysteria?" Maedhros Mar 2015 #36
I see see why you're not seeing it Skittles Mar 2015 #37
I stand in awe of your reasoning. [n/t] Maedhros Mar 2015 #40
Why do so many who oppose Hillary support Warren? nt LittleBlue Mar 2015 #35
It's totally safe to support someone who is not going to run. They can never disappoint you. Hekate Mar 2015 #46
There is a huge difference between Republiconism and Conservativism. The sexist Republicans rhett o rick Mar 2015 #38
Good lord. That's the only reason someone can disagree with her?? arcane1 Mar 2015 #42
I hear you. I really don't care for much of her politics. I don't like her cali Mar 2015 #11
Well, looks like this story will last for months, so I guess you will be a hard core supporter by dissentient Mar 2015 #13
It only looks that way because there isn't something newer and shinier to ponder HereSince1628 Mar 2015 #14
This has been a familiar pattern with both Clintons for decades. enough Mar 2015 #16
"I'll be voting for X just because I'll be so pissed at his/her enemies." ND-Dem Mar 2015 #21
Actually the pattern is this... wyldwolf Mar 2015 #23
I think you stated my feelings quite well...Thank you..n/t monmouth4 Mar 2015 #45
She capitulated to Republicons. She is partially responsible for the deaths of thousands. rhett o rick Mar 2015 #22
Has Elizabeth Warren called for the immediate withdrawl of our trips from Iraq/Afghanistan? brooklynite Mar 2015 #26
So now you are thinking about supporting her? liberal N proud Mar 2015 #28
that's the thing Skittles Mar 2015 #29
You are right, I was never in her camp but this piling on is a bit much and a good hard monmouth4 Mar 2015 #32
In the long run, this tempest in a tea cup won't matter. Beacool Mar 2015 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I think I'm doing a re-th...»Reply #23