General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I never, ever thought I'd see the day [View all]Lancero
(3,003 posts)Will Pitt's spirited defense of John Kerry's vote for the IWR
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6326455
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Why call out (in a derogatory manner) someone not participating in the thread who is not here to defend themselves. It is uncalled for and has traditionally been against the rules.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Mar 7, 2015, 08:51 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I might be interpreting things wrong, but I see it more as pointing out how hypocrital DUers are for giving Kerry a pass on voting for the IWR, yet - As Wolf puts it - they jump to burn Hillary at the stake because she voted yes.
Essentially, it's the 'speaks his mind' vs 'angry woman' ideal that so many on DU love to call Republicans out for - That is, treating genders differently when both do the same exact thing. Kerry? He's speaking his mind. Hillary? She's a angry women who, according to some on DU, is successful only because she slept with a guy who got a blowjob in the White House.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Put this in a Pitt thread and it may be OK. Not so much here.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I humbly say suck it up. Mr. Pitt is well equipped to handle this ish without an alert. He doesn't need a jury defense.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It is a double standard, fine to be exposed.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given