Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hillary's Email: How to deal with deleting selected items in a large amount of email. [View all]Logical
(22,457 posts)43. So true, the OP is pure BS. nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
148 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hillary's Email: How to deal with deleting selected items in a large amount of email. [View all]
MineralMan
Mar 2015
OP
BINGO. And we ALL know how Manny feels about Hillary Clinton...or any other Democrat, reallly. eom
BlueCaliDem
Mar 2015
#59
Hmm. But isn't it odd that the Hillary-haters are so obsessed with the email nonsense.
DanTex
Mar 2015
#69
It was not provided in digital format because they wouldn't accept anything but paper.
LiberalFighter
Mar 2015
#136
OK, maybe she misplayed it politically. But probably not. It will go away and nobody will care.
DanTex
Mar 2015
#57
Of course you don't trust polls. They reflect political reality, which is not your friend here.
DanTex
Mar 2015
#88
With "blinders" you mean, people who aren't hawk-eyed focused on every tiny
BlueCaliDem
Mar 2015
#62
Remind me, who was it that brought up *your* email accounts as an example?
MannyGoldstein
Mar 2015
#35
You wrote that ALL businesses have a legal obligation to retain their emails
MannyGoldstein
Mar 2015
#42
LOL! I cannot believe what people will say instead of just admitting they are wrong!
Rex
Mar 2015
#143
That's because it is total bullshit. I can't believe some of the garbage I am reading.
Rex
Mar 2015
#142
No, if she had separate accounts she would have had to decide for each and every mail
pnwmom
Mar 2015
#90
Right now, it looks like she committed error upon error to evade revealing her official messages.
leveymg
Mar 2015
#16
I said, that's what it looks like. When and if her server is examined, assuming half the email
leveymg
Mar 2015
#32
That explanation pretty much shows all the criticsm for what it is, nonsense.
greatlaurel
Mar 2015
#14
You are correct. Actually, in really big cases, discovery and disclosure review are outsourced
leveymg
Mar 2015
#36
Hillary's lawyers seem to have applied an inverted sort of e-discovery solution.
leveymg
Mar 2015
#110
Your posts are always interesting and the computer posts are written so people like me learn a lot.
greatlaurel
Mar 2015
#25
We haven't seen the full set of algorithms, just the examples given in the TIME article.
leveymg
Mar 2015
#19
"None of us knows the details" but you are SURE it worked better than people. LOL, OK, brilliant!!
Logical
Mar 2015
#75
You are the one that made the claim that it was way more accurate than people......
Logical
Mar 2015
#87
HRC is coming out of this like a champ. The GOP has gone down in flames in the past two weeks.
greatlaurel
Mar 2015
#49
You should provide the information since you are using him as an important source.
greatlaurel
Mar 2015
#63
Deleted emails aren't automatically "gone" from the server, nor do most people send or receive
hughee99
Mar 2015
#76
She deleted email that she determined to be not relevant to the national archives.
hughee99
Mar 2015
#107
I'm not arguing she did anything illegal, but I am arguing that she, and others who did this
hughee99
Mar 2015
#114
You think the "government couldn't run an email system in 2008" defense is viable?
hughee99
Mar 2015
#118
What I think is irrelevant. I have nothing to do with government email services.
MineralMan
Mar 2015
#119
Standard electronic discovery techniques are far more suited than what has been described.
Ms. Toad
Mar 2015
#128